Page 3 of 8

Band: Mission of Burma

Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2006 4:20 pm
by OneFiveFour_Archive
The t-shirt says it all - ....


that's a fine opinion and all, if you didn't bring this up in 10 other threads already. get over it.

(no offense)

Band: Mission of Burma

Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2006 5:34 pm
by tommydski_Archive
This thread is about Mission of Burma isn't it?

Don't get me wrong, I love the 80s material. I just don't think the new stuff cuts it at all. To be fair, I did see them live a couple of years back and they were very good. The new records just don't have the same magic.

Band: Mission of Burma

Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2006 5:52 pm
by that damned fly_Archive
the$inmusicisallmine wrote:
that damned fly wrote:
Mark Lansing wrote:...if OnOffOn isn't quite better than Vs., it sits comfortably beside it as a landmark work of intelligent yet powerfully physical rock and roll.


it isn't.

it doesn't sit beside it, but maybe near it. like it goes, vs., signals..., horrible truth, peking spring, forget and then OnOffOn.


right.


for future reference the stooges and the birthday party are better than burma.

Band: Mission of Burma

Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2006 6:10 pm
by rocker654_Archive
that damned fly wrote:
the$inmusicisallmine wrote:
that damned fly wrote:
Mark Lansing wrote:...if OnOffOn isn't quite better than Vs., it sits comfortably beside it as a landmark work of intelligent yet powerfully physical rock and roll.


it isn't.

it doesn't sit beside it, but maybe near it. like it goes, vs., signals..., horrible truth, peking spring, forget and then OnOffOn.


right.


for future reference the stooges and the birthday party are better than burma.


For future reference, that statement is only half-correct.

Band: Mission of Burma

Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2006 8:52 pm
by that damned fly_Archive
rocker654 wrote:
that damned fly wrote:
the$inmusicisallmine wrote:
that damned fly wrote:
Mark Lansing wrote:...if OnOffOn isn't quite better than Vs., it sits comfortably beside it as a landmark work of intelligent yet powerfully physical rock and roll.


it isn't.

it doesn't sit beside it, but maybe near it. like it goes, vs., signals..., horrible truth, peking spring, forget and then OnOffOn.


right.


for future reference the stooges and the birthday party are better than burma.


For future reference, that statement is entirely correct.


i fixed it.

Band: Mission of Burma

Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2006 9:23 pm
by rocker654_Archive
I agree to disagree.

Your fixtion is wrong and fictitious.

Mission of Burma kicked all kinds of ass over the Birthday Party. In fact, I will go as far to say as any of the Birthday Party's output is unmemorable--because I don't remember it. But I do remember having one of their albums for a brief period in the mid-eighties. It left no impression on me.

Funny, this thread reminds me that one of the few crucial acts I've missed live over the years was Iggy.

Band: Mission of Burma

Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2006 9:26 pm
by Christopher J McGarvey_Archive
tommydski wrote:1 superb live album.
Is it good?

Seriously, is it actually good?

I remember trying to listen to it because I was going to buy it and the recording was so awful that I couldn't tell whether it was good or not.

As far as the new stuff goes, I like it a lot.
The recordings are excellent and the songwriting is still up to par.

ps. I will mention that I think "That's When I Reach for My Revolver" is a bad song. "Trem Two" is their best.

Band: Mission of Burma

Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2006 9:43 pm
by connor_Archive
rocker654 wrote:I agree to disagree.

Your fixtion is wrong and fictitious.

Mission of Burma kicked all kinds of ass over the Birthday Party. In fact, I will go as far to say as any of the Birthday Party's output is unmemorable--because I don't remember it. But I do remember having one of their albums for a brief period in the mid-eighties. It left no impression on me.

Funny, this thread reminds me that one of the few crucial acts I've missed live over the years was Iggy.

I really feel no need whatsoever to rank those bands. As far as I'm concerned, they're all in my top 10. Hell, maybe even top 5.

Band: Mission of Burma

Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2006 9:44 pm
by that damned fly_Archive
rocker654 wrote:I agree to disagree.

Your fixtion is wrong and fictitious.

Mission of Burma kicked all kinds of ass over the Birthday Party. In fact, I will go as far to say as any of the Birthday Party's output is unmemorable--because I don't remember it. But I do remember having one of their albums for a brief period in the mid-eighties. It left no impression on me.

Funny, this thread reminds me that one of the few crucial acts I've missed live over the years was Iggy.


i agree to let the board decide. mission of burma vs. the birthday party.

Band: Mission of Burma

Posted: Sat Nov 18, 2006 9:31 am
by tommydski_Archive
Christopher J. McGarvey wrote:
tommydski wrote:1 superb live album.
Is it good?

Seriously, is it actually good?

I remember trying to listen to it because I was going to buy it and the recording was so awful that I couldn't tell whether it was good or not.


I liked it a lot when I thought Burma were the best band ever. This was most likely when I was maybe 16 or 17 and sound quality or 'production' meant absolutely nothing to me. It is abrasive but I gather that was the point. Hence the album title I guess.