Intern_8033 wrote:If you actually knew anything about Billy beyond the elitist rhetoric you spew in your little jaded circles of isolated assholes, you would know that he was conscious of the quirkiness of this lyric when he wrote it.
Show me a song you wrote that's better than piano man and then you can complain.
I don't know what makes it "elitist rhetoric" to point out a bad line in a bad song. Is it elitist to want the music you consume to be good? Then I'm a card-carrying elistist!
And I don't think being "conscious of the quirkiness" gets Bill off the hook. One of the things I hate most about the post-modern mindset (not that I think Billy Joel is "post-modern" or anything) is the notion that, if you're conscious of something, all bets are off. Look: if you wrote a shitty song and are aware of it and were being all ironic and shit,
you still wrote a shitty song.
For the record, when I was an ignorant youth, I owned two or three Billy Joel records, and I even recall enjoying them somewhat. But when I matured beyond the level of hackneyed Romanticism and boozy self-absorption, I got that shit out of my life.
I also don't think one has to have written better songs than someone in order to validly critique that person's work. I criticize the weather even though I can't "make" it; I criticize Louisville basketball players although my game is passable at best. I criticize women's looks although I am neither a female not particularly "pretty." Big fucking deal! Opinions are like assholes, and everyone's stinks but yours. Asshole.
In closing, I'd venture to say that I've written many, many songs better than "Piano Man," but artistic merit is, of course, wholly subjective, so who's to say in the end? I think it's a pretty safe bet, though, that I've never written a line as bad as that "tonic & gin" groaner, and that includes when I was sixteen and singing in hardcore bands.