What have I got myself into?

23
A co-worker basically threw this CD in my hand and said to "check this out" with absolutely no solicitation from me. After reading the liner-notes, (Desmond Child!), and checking-out the overblown production and derivative vocal gymnastics, I wanted to approach her and ask what exactly was it that inspired her to let me borrow this CD with no provocation coming from my end. I imagined her looking at me morph into a giant lollipop like on the old cartoonies.

So bad.

What have I got myself into?

25
I'm just going to put this out there and see what occurs. When I first heard 'Grace Kelly' on the radio, I though "wow, Robbie Williams has finally got a decent song on the radio again". When I found out it wasn't Robbie Williams, I thought "that's a pretty crap Robbie Williams rip off, and it'll probably be huge", and then I thought, "sucks to be Robbie Williams, I guess."

I have visions of Robbie Williams drunkenly trampling around his record company's office, shrieking "Why didn't you buy this song for me?! Why?!"
Twenty-four hours a week, seven days a month

What have I got myself into?

26
H-GM wrote:A co-worker basically threw this CD in my hand and said to "check this out" with absolutely no solicitation from me. After reading the liner-notes, (Desmond Child!), and checking-out the overblown production and derivative vocal gymnastics, I wanted to approach her and ask what exactly was it that inspired her to let me borrow this CD with no provocation coming from my end. I imagined her looking at me morph into a giant lollipop like on the old cartoonies.

So bad.


I'm going to guess it's because this is probably considered very "gay friendly" music by most people. He does sound like a childish version of Freddy Mercury. If that was the reason, I'm sorry you have to put up with
assumptions like that.

What have I got myself into?

27
Mark Hansen wrote:
H-GM wrote:A co-worker basically threw this CD in my hand and said to "check this out" with absolutely no solicitation from me. After reading the liner-notes, (Desmond Child!), and checking-out the overblown production and derivative vocal gymnastics, I wanted to approach her and ask what exactly was it that inspired her to let me borrow this CD with no provocation coming from my end. I imagined her looking at me morph into a giant lollipop like on the old cartoonies.

So bad.


I'm going to guess it's because this is probably considered very "gay friendly" music by most people. He does sound like a childish version of Freddy Mercury. If that was the reason, I'm sorry you have to put up with
assumptions like that.


Yikes :shock:

Unfortunately I have to beat the ladies off with a stick but I guess she saw right through my swarthy and masculine demeanor.

*imagines her watching me morph into a rainbow flag or something*

:(

What have I got myself into?

28
daniel robert chapman wrote:I'm just going to put this out there and see what occurs. When I first heard 'Grace Kelly' on the radio, I though "wow, Robbie Williams has finally got a decent song on the radio again". When I found out it wasn't Robbie Williams, I thought "that's a pretty crap Robbie Williams rip off, and it'll probably be huge", and then I thought, "sucks to be Robbie Williams, I guess."

I have visions of Robbie Williams drunkenly trampling around his record company's office, shrieking "Why didn't you buy this song for me?! Why?!"


I think the singing is a little too snazzy for Goon Williams, although no doubt he could be electronically mangled sufficiently to provide a performance.

I assumed it was a Scando (so good at these things are they) band of pretty, skinny twenty-somethings who'd cleverly copped late-era (naffer) Queen for the marketing thereof. I was not a little disappointed to learn that A it wasn't, and B the rest of the record is (more) dire.

What have I got myself into?

29
H-GM wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
H-GM wrote:A co-worker basically threw this CD in my hand and said to "check this out" with absolutely no solicitation from me. After reading the liner-notes, (Desmond Child!), and checking-out the overblown production and derivative vocal gymnastics, I wanted to approach her and ask what exactly was it that inspired her to let me borrow this CD with no provocation coming from my end. I imagined her looking at me morph into a giant lollipop like on the old cartoonies.

So bad.


I'm going to guess it's because this is probably considered very "gay friendly" music by most people. He does sound like a childish version of Freddy Mercury. If that was the reason, I'm sorry you have to put up with
assumptions like that.


Yikes :shock:

Unfortunately I have to beat the ladies off with a stick but I guess she saw right through my swarthy and masculine demeanor.

*imagines her watching me morph into a rainbow flag or something*

:(


Well I know you're gay based on other posts you've made. I figured most people you interact with know you're gay, as you don't seem like someone who would be hiding it from anyone. Being gay has never stopped a woman from hitting on a guy she perceived as hot, in my experience. Remember, my girlfriend is telling me how great this guy is. Maybe that means she thinks I should get a rainbow flag tattoo now. sigh

What have I got myself into?

30
Mark Hansen wrote:It probably won't be AS BAD as when I saw Dave Matthews at Alpine Valley. I hated that(I knew that going in), and I couldn't just leave in the middle of it if I found it too torturous. Th only way I got through that was by drinking heavily, and trying to pass out on the blanket spread out on the ground. And that was difficult, since Alpine Valley is on a slope. If you fall asleep, there is a very real possibility of rolling down the slope.


I can't say that I have any idea who these Mikas are, but I can only imagine that they couldn't be worse, as

Redline wrote:at least the songs will be shorter.


and the Mikas fans probably aren't full-on pseudo-hippies.

So, at least you've got that going for you.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest