lemur68 wrote:

nice eye placement.
hahah

Damn, she's pretty hideous looking.

Christopher J. McGarvey wrote:Does this mean we're all retards when compared to our ancestors?
Were the early people a bunch of fucking geniuses?
Would humans be smarter if the population was smaller?

Are we not men?

Christopher J. McGarvey wrote:This may seem or actually be far fetched, but aren't we all the products of cousin fucking?
I figure at one point that there were only a few men and woman to begin with so for our species to develop they had to do have some inter-familial relations and we all know that can lead to retardation.
Does this mean we're all retards when compared to our ancestors?
Were the early people a bunch of fucking geniuses?
Would humans be smarter if the population was smaller?

I suspect there would've been at least thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, of early primates. There seems to be an aversion, genetically, to fucking your relatives.

If there were only a handful of early primates, we wouldn't be here to talk about cousin fucking. We'd be dead, because the severely retarded inbred couldn't fend for themselves.

I doubt humans would be smarter if there was a smaller population. A lot of prehistoric skulls found showed the brain cavity to be bigger than ours. Those cavemen could've probably mastered the art of blogging.

Skronk wrote: Those cavemen could've probably mastered the art of blogging.

What, on rocks?

I'd think that humanity, like any species, would have to be traceable back to a single organism, the first of the species.

The only reason they trace it back to a woman (the real "Eve") is because they're using mitochondrial DNA, which is inherited from the mother. MtDNA is the only kind of DNA that can be used to make a 100% positive identification. Also, trace amounts of mtDNA have been found in the found teeth of hominids and early humans, where nuclear DNA would have broken down.

Colonel Panic wrote:I'd think that humanity, like any species, would have to be traceable back to a single organism, the first of the species.

So someone fucked an amoeba?
Didn't we learn our lesson when that guy fucked an AIDS monkey?
Stupid fucking inbred humans.

Christopher J. McGarvey wrote:

Skronk wrote: Those cavemen could've probably mastered the art of blogging.

What, on rocks?

On a pod chair:

Christopher J. McGarvey wrote:

Colonel Panic wrote:I'd think that humanity, like any species, would have to be traceable back to a single organism, the first of the species.

So someone fucked an amoeba?
Didn't we learn our lesson when that guy fucked an AIDS monkey?
Stupid fucking inbred humans.

Hehe no, amoebas don't reproduce sexually. They just kind of split apart into two. But hey, to each his own, you know?

I'm adopted, so all bets are off.