but these 2 words
are not necessary.Minotaur029 wrote:I don't care how much of an establishment candidate you consider Obama to be, unless he gets assassinated (<- entirely possible)
it's not like you're going to prevent an assassination by warning obama here.
it's not like we think assassination is impossible.
it's not like it makes you look smarter.
i'm not calling you selfish, but why else would you point this out?
at best, it's poor conversation art.
at worst, it's sadistic voyeurism.
i know you're not the only one. rick pulls this crap in the ron paul thread. i can't stand it. you may have nothing to lose, but it's a catch-22. if he doesn't get assassinated, then you were just a prophet of doom. if he does get assassinated, then you (presumably) won't feel the satisfaction of being right.
i'm reminded of this
sparky wrote:It is predictable, but that does not mean that being confronted by the act itself is not a psychological blow. Sure, we all thought [Bhutto's] murder was likely. However, to use a crude example, it is one thing to acknowledge that your parents will die one day; it is another to see them laid out on the slab.