kerble, these oranger mp3s, you are right, they do not capture completely the craziness of the man's drumming. they are mostly kind of slow. but you get the idea.
this oranger, though, they are pretty good band. i have forgot, that i think they are pretty good. it is not 'my cup of tea,' and yet i like it, so if this is your cup of tea--the 60s psych pop is decent pigeonhole to make for it--you will maybe think it is really really good.
it is approx 100 times better than most music like this
the flipsides, the one mp3, maybe she is nothing special, with nothing special drumming. but is only one mp3.
Tim, what does your drummer think about the Bonham/Moon divide? (Actually, come to think of it, I can think of some Moon-ish moments from Michael.)
i think he loves them both. he plays a bit like them both at times.
i think bonham is the drummers' hendrix, in that a lot of drummers don't even want to talk about him. he's such a given peak in rock drumming, and as you say totally possible to approach but almost impossible to equal, that they'd all rather say they are influenced by charlie watts or mick avery (who's great and underrated) or levon helm or something. when it's really bonham who set the standard.
moon is more like jeff beck or something. hendrix, you can ape hendrix passably. i don't know how you go about aping jeff beck. he's such an idiosyncratic player that he is very hard to imitate. hendrix's idiosyncracies, like bonham's, were in the sheer depth of his technique and mastery of the instrument. beck's, like moon's, are in his unique view of the instrument.
people who have only heard modern jeff beck will have no idea what i'm talking about