toomanyhelicopters wrote:not the fancy decorated Brits or anything (actual knights, who are titled Sir), but just in general, just guys like you and me. like, "yes sir" or "no sir" or "thank you, sir" etc. sometimes maybe it makes some sense, but mostly it doesn't, to me. i am generally not happy when people call me sir. regardless of who it is, like if it's a 16-year-old kid, or a 50-year-old guy, i just plain don't like it.
you?
I don't really like it, but I say NOT CRAP, because I can't think of an alternative polite way to address a guy whose name you don't know. And for whatever reason, "mister" comes off as a little adversarial, or at least impatient. I use "comrade" only for close acquaintances.
Gramsci wrote:This is something I've noticed Americans do a lot. Strange considering the whole revolution and "all men are equal" thing...
I've never heard that used anywhere else but to address a "Sir" as a title in the UK and "sir" as in anyone they feel like in the US, even in a restaurant in London they never call you sir.
I think it fits in extremely well with the "all men are... equal" thing. Everyone who is prepared (or looks prepared) to spend money in even the cheapest retail establishment gets to be called sir, rather than just those who shot down Messerschmitts, or brought in hard currency by selling pop records in the 1960s.