sphincter wrote:I don't understand all this hate against the Argument!? That album is possibly Fugazi at their peak, some of the songs are fucked up and freaky in such an awesome way. Brilliant record.
well, seems to me they ran out of ideas, reworked some old songs into new songs, and then used this drummer as a creative catalyst which didn't really work out all that well.
having two drummers on more than half the songs should have made them more interesting rhythmically but instead it barely masked the issue that they were creatively dry. jerry busher could not save the fact that they were tired of it.
i recall reading various interviews around the time of "end hits" that every album cover and title had a hidden meaning.
"end hits." what could that mean? the skyline of (i think) tokyo? dunno.
"the argument." what argument? the hand holding a torch and the empty hand? hm...real stumper that one.
i don't think they planned to do one more album after "end hits." when i saw them the first time they opened with "song #5" and closed with "the argument."
i think they just wound up writing a couple songs with jerry and figuring what the hell, might as well do one more album since we got the songs for it. if they had done an EP instead it'd be pretty killer with the right tracks from the "furniture" single and "the argument." instead, we get an ok single with what may be the very first/worst fugazi song written, and an album that is really just not up to anything previous. it's just weak. i feel for you if these songs excite you. with an exception or two between the single and album most of these have me reaching for the skip button.
the awesome EP would have been:
song #5
new morning
full disclosure
epic problem
nightshop
the argument
fuck all the rest of it. (i was on the fence about "ex spectator" and figured if i'm on the fence then fuck it.)