"fascistic atheists"
That's rich.
Richard Dawkins Accepts Possibility Of Intelligent Design
222Rick Reuben wrote:...talking out their asses, and unwisely feeding their massive egos based on erroneous information.
Hmmm... I've seen quite a lot of that kind of behavior, somewhere...
Rick Reuben wrote:Until these blowhard faux opponents of religion learn to recognize other mythologies that are staring them in the face every day and then develop the spine to go after them...
Those "other mythologies" you speak of... what might those be?
Rick Reuben wrote:I'll keep laughing at them as they puff their chests out and 'dress down' God believers. They pick safe battles and then they fight them very loudly.
Well that's quite an ironic statement.
Richard Dawkins Accepts Possibility Of Intelligent Design
223Rick Reuben wrote:Okay. Are you part of 'everyone'? Detail money and power on Earth. Start from the top and work down. It should be easy for you. Use scientific method. Expose the lies of capitalism as ruthlessly as you expose the lies of intelligent design.Chromodynamic wrote:So, it's the liberals fucking providence to root out the real villains in society? Fuck that, it should be EVERYONE's responsibility to do that.
What? You think I would not include myself when I put 'everyone' in big capital letters? Am I not adequately taking up the mantle of the bat? Let's demand bigger and better things from science and then piss all over those people who make our lives easier when they decide to voice their opinion, bravo!
Richard Dawkins Accepts Possibility Of Intelligent Design
224I'd just like to point out that when pressed to actually name these "atheists" he's railing against, Rick Reuben identified newberry and Col Panic, two people who have said they do not identify as atheists.
http://www.ifihadahifi.net
http://www.superstarcastic.com
http://www.superstarcastic.com
Marsupialized wrote:Thank you so much for the pounding, it came in handy.
Richard Dawkins Accepts Possibility Of Intelligent Design
225Rick Reuben wrote:All I know about you is what I read on the board. Sorry to say, but I have no idea who or what you are politically. If you've made numerous posts to the political threads, I don't remember them. We can start here:Chromodynamic wrote:What? You think I would not include myself when I put 'everyone' in big capital letters?
What are the biggest threats to America's economic prosperity?
What are your proposed solutions?
That will help me get a read on your ideology.
This way Rick will know if you should be added to his enemies/traitors list. It's just more convenient for him if you let him know upfront.
Available in hit crimson or surprising process this calculator will physics up your kitchen
Richard Dawkins Accepts Possibility Of Intelligent Design
226Ricardo,
I know it's a small point but can you say "fascist" instead? Fascist is already an adjective. "Fascistic" suffers from adjective inflation. What's next, "fascistical"?
Yes, I know "fascistic" is technically a word, but it seems a little too ebonic for someone so anal.
As I've pointed out several times before, the main reason why many sellout liberals are fascistic atheists
I know it's a small point but can you say "fascist" instead? Fascist is already an adjective. "Fascistic" suffers from adjective inflation. What's next, "fascistical"?
Yes, I know "fascistic" is technically a word, but it seems a little too ebonic for someone so anal.
Richard Dawkins Accepts Possibility Of Intelligent Design
227So who are these "sellout liberals" ? And who are the "fascist atheists"?
Are these organized groups of people who deliberately swear their faith to common, prescribed ethics or dogmas?
If not, then how do you know that they all subscribe to a common belief regarding the economic predicament of the USA and the world?
And if they didn't have faith in the US monetary system, then what alternative would they have?
What do you use for currency? In what form of currency is your paycheck rendered? What do you exchange for the necessities of life like food, shelter and utility services, if you're not relying on US currency?
And if you are still trading with US currency despite all your claims of its worthlessness and tyrannical origins, how are you any better than these sellout liberals you keep railing against? Do you really think you're so superior, just because you have the huevos grandes to type angry words on a rock music Internet forum?
Who is the one puffing his chest around here, feeding his own ego by insulting and alienating his fellow forum members, making a big show of 'fighting battles', when all he's really doing is sitting at home, trolling on the Internet?
Are these organized groups of people who deliberately swear their faith to common, prescribed ethics or dogmas?
If not, then how do you know that they all subscribe to a common belief regarding the economic predicament of the USA and the world?
And if they didn't have faith in the US monetary system, then what alternative would they have?
What do you use for currency? In what form of currency is your paycheck rendered? What do you exchange for the necessities of life like food, shelter and utility services, if you're not relying on US currency?
And if you are still trading with US currency despite all your claims of its worthlessness and tyrannical origins, how are you any better than these sellout liberals you keep railing against? Do you really think you're so superior, just because you have the huevos grandes to type angry words on a rock music Internet forum?
Who is the one puffing his chest around here, feeding his own ego by insulting and alienating his fellow forum members, making a big show of 'fighting battles', when all he's really doing is sitting at home, trolling on the Internet?
Richard Dawkins Accepts Possibility Of Intelligent Design
228Rick Reuben wrote:All I know about you is what I read on the board. Sorry to say, but I have no idea who or what you are politically. If you've made numerous posts to the political threads, I don't remember them. We can start here:Chromodynamic wrote:What? You think I would not include myself when I put 'everyone' in big capital letters?
What are the biggest threats to America's economic prosperity?
What are your proposed solutions?
That will help me get a read on your ideology.
The biggest threats? I would count people's overwhelming ignorance to be the number one problem, the economy is sinking and what do we care about? Who got kicked off on Dancing With the Stars last night! I am generalizing, and can't help but feel this is the kind of thing that can be disregarded as youthful idealism most commonly reserved for high-schoolers entering their first year of college. The second thing would probably be our mutual friend: The Federal Reserve. The monumentally boring economics class I took in high school started off slightly interesting when the teacher made the following declaration: "the President is not the most powerful man in this country, the chairman of the Federal Reserve is."
I have no proposed solution because I am more interested in doing dumb shit like, help the poor, and cure sick people in whatever dump of a country I can get into, rather than fuss over America's bloated sense of self.
Edit: My political ideology shouldn't even be an issue, whether I am a democrat, republican, libertarian, whig, federalist, whatever won't change the fact that I hardly find it fascist that some scientists are voicing their disbelief and proselytizing just like a pastor or preacher from any other religion, which is openly tolerated and accepted as free speech.
Last edited by Chromodynamic_Archive on Thu Mar 27, 2008 12:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Richard Dawkins Accepts Possibility Of Intelligent Design
229Colonel Panic wrote:So who are these "sellout liberals" ? And who are the "fascist atheists"?
Are these organized groups of people who deliberately swear their faith to common, prescribed ethics or dogmas?
Dude, I've been trying to find out the same thing. And also how can I profit from selling out? Who do I have to see?
Richard Dawkins Accepts Possibility Of Intelligent Design
230Will someone please define "atheists" as it has to do per this discussion? Or at the very least agree on one definition that suits it.
Rick defines them as "sell-out liberal facists." Newberry and others define them as someone lacking a belief in a god. Other have offered no definition.
There is no discussion here if all sides are arguing over something that is not clearly defined.
Rick defines them as "sell-out liberal facists." Newberry and others define them as someone lacking a belief in a god. Other have offered no definition.
There is no discussion here if all sides are arguing over something that is not clearly defined.
www.23beatsoff.blogspot.com
Nina wrote: We're all growing too old to expect solace from watching Camus and Ayn Rand copulate.