Page 24 of 43

radio personality: rush limbaugh

Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2007 3:54 pm
by matthew_Archive
BadComrade wrote:"Anyone willing to work hard can be rich"


Excuse me.

I never said that, nor do I believe that. Nor do I even think that great wealth is the end-all of life and thus should be a driving ambition for people. What I am talking about is living a life without dire want. Let's be clear on that much.

radio personality: rush limbaugh

Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2007 4:01 pm
by dipshit jigaboo_Archive
There were nearly 4,000 homeless people on Long Island and more than 48,000 in New York City in 2005 -- the vast majority of them families with children, according to a federal government report released Wednesday.

The numbers were the result of a Department of Housing and Urban Development project that crunched numbers from shelters and thousands of volunteers who fanned out across the country to count the homeless, one by one.

Overall, the department found that there were 754,000 homeless in the United States on one night in January 2005, a "snapshot" of the population that officials said would prevent people from being counted twice over time. About 338,000 of the homeless were living outside.

In Suffolk, there were 2,728 homeless people, the vast majority in shelters. Dozens of volunteers walked through woods, over train tracks and into abandoned buildings to find 196 of them living on the streets. In Nassau there were 1,215 homeless, 91 of them outside.

In New York City, there were 43,759 people in municipal shelters and 4,395 on the streets, the report said.

However, even those who helped compile the numbers said they missed many homeless people, especially those living outside in scattered forest encampments on Long Island.

http://www.newsday.com/news/local/longi ... 8424.story

Maybe someone should loan them some Ayn Rand, or teach them the values of self-sacrifice and hard work. Lazy bums need to get a job.

radio personality: rush limbaugh

Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2007 4:02 pm
by dipshit jigaboo_Archive
BadComrade wrote:
you wrote:And the way up is: ambition, hard work and sacrifice, meaning self-sacrifice in the end. It's as simple as that, bob.

Hard work: How can you work hard at a job you can't attain?


The funny thing is, you can work your ass off and still end up in the shithole. At which point you are told to "work smarter, not harder".

radio personality: rush limbaugh

Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2007 4:09 pm
by matthew_Archive
dipshit jigaboo wrote:
There were nearly 4,000 homeless people on Long Island and more than 48,000 in New York City in 2005 -- the vast majority of them families with children, according to a federal government report released Wednesday.

The numbers were the result of a Department of Housing and Urban Development project that crunched numbers from shelters and thousands of volunteers who fanned out across the country to count the homeless, one by one.

Overall, the department found that there were 754,000 homeless in the United States on one night in January 2005, a "snapshot" of the population that officials said would prevent people from being counted twice over time. About 338,000 of the homeless were living outside.

In Suffolk, there were 2,728 homeless people, the vast majority in shelters. Dozens of volunteers walked through woods, over train tracks and into abandoned buildings to find 196 of them living on the streets. In Nassau there were 1,215 homeless, 91 of them outside.

In New York City, there were 43,759 people in municipal shelters and 4,395 on the streets, the report said.

However, even those who helped compile the numbers said they missed many homeless people, especially those living outside in scattered forest encampments on Long Island.

http://www.newsday.com/news/local/longi ... 8424.story

Maybe someone should loan them some Ayn Rand, or teach them the values of self-sacrifice and hard work. Lazy bums need to get a job.


For the majority of them, I'm sure that's just what the doctor ordered...sans the Ayn Rand of course.

radio personality: rush limbaugh

Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2007 4:11 pm
by clocker bob_Archive
Now, state very clearly: Is it fair to pay those on the bottom rung a substandard wage?

Do not answer with a 'blame the poor' argument.

Are you going to duck this question, Clown?

radio personality: rush limbaugh

Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2007 4:12 pm
by Boombats_Archive
Boombats wrote:
matthew wrote:you ever had a conversation with a "poor" or homeless man? I have.....many times actually, and in several parts of the country.


Buying meth and handjobs from a man named Rufus doesn't count as "conversation."


Sorry everyone I know I said we should stop with this crap but I couldn't resist.

radio personality: rush limbaugh

Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2007 4:20 pm
by Boombats_Archive
Hey, how about that Rush Limbaugh? What a doofus eh?

radio personality: rush limbaugh

Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2007 4:25 pm
by Redline_Archive
Hey, how about that Rush Limbaugh? What a doofus eh?


He's so crazy!

radio personality: rush limbaugh

Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2007 4:28 pm
by dipshit jigaboo_Archive
Listening to Rush Limbaugh is like watching a boot stomping down on the face of the poor, forever.

radio personality: rush limbaugh

Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2007 4:31 pm
by matthew_Archive
steve wrote:
matthew wrote: Genuine poverty is virtually nonexistent in this country.

You are out of your fucking mind.


Show me the destitute, starving masses in the country who are helpless victims, Steve! Or is it that your definition of poverty is one made up by government bureaucracy and exploited and twisted by the mainstream media? Come on! Show me!