Rick Reuben wrote:Whether a study is published and whether a study passes peer review are two different things.
True.
I may try to get my friend to comment on this, if she has the time. Some of the stories she has told me about studies based on faulty assumptions, faulty math, and faulty statistical methods are kind of mind-boggling.
There seems to be a disconnect between the science of some of this research, and the underlying statistical methods commonly used. A lot of researchers don't really understand statistics very well.
My friend is kind of (well, is) a genius when it comes to this.