Do you use Gmail or Yahoo.uk for email?

I use Gmail
Total votes: 91 (76%)
I use Yahoo.uk
Total votes: 4 (3%)
I use neither
Total votes: 24 (20%)
Total votes: 119

Who uses Gmail or Yahoo.uk?

31
steve wrote:
242sumner wrote:Why dont you block just the yahoo.uk? There are only two people here who use It. You could ask them to get another account.

Because it would be rude. There's got to be a better way, I just haven't figured it out yet.


As there only seems to be one other person alongside myself using a yahoo.uk account here, I feel that it's only reasonable to offer to set-up a separate account for EA forum use if it should cut back on potential spammage. No problem at all, and i'm sure that the other member would say the same.

Weird...I really thought that 'everyone' used yahoo email too.

Who uses Gmail or Yahoo.uk?

32
Don't know if this will help steve, but how much of your time is spent tracking spam users down, versus the actual removal? If tracking is an issue, we could create a thread, make it a sticky, and forum members could post a link to the new spammer's profile as well as a link to their post. Make it a simple format like:

user | post

That way everything would be in one place, we can do some of the work for you, but you wouldn't have to actually give any of us admin rights. Would that be of any value to you?

Who uses Gmail or Yahoo.uk?

33
steve wrote: One suggestion was to require all new forum registrations to post in a special "welcome" forum, after which their accounts would be manually unlocked to the rest of the forums if they aren't spambots, and left unactivated if they are. That still requires me to manually activate all new forum members and I'm trying to reduce, not increase my workload.

Just called it "work" again.


Make Scott moderator of that forum.

Who uses Gmail or Yahoo.uk?

34
steve wrote:We are using captchas at the moment

Those grainy captchas aren't really all that effective anymore. Newer OCR software can read through that kind of noise pretty easily.

The most effective ones are the monochromatic ones where the letters are distorted, and their edges touch or overlap slightly:

Image


Those are usually not too difficult for humans to read, but current OCR software cannot decipher them.

BTW, I use Gmail too.

Who uses Gmail or Yahoo.uk?

35
steve wrote:
242sumner wrote:Why dont you block just the yahoo.uk? There are only two people here who use It. You could ask them to get another account.

Because it would be rude. There's got to be a better way, I just haven't figured it out yet.

We are using captchas at the moment, and there is a test question for new members, and those have helped a lot, but I'd still like to improve it. One suggestion was to require all new forum registrations to post in a special "welcome" forum, after which their accounts would be manually unlocked to the rest of the forums if they aren't spambots, and left unactivated if they are. That still requires me to manually activate all new forum members and I'm trying to reduce, not increase my workload.

Just called it "work" again.



You could write a php script to automate when users post to this special thread.
That would save you some "hobby".


Cheers.

Who uses Gmail or Yahoo.uk?

38
Colonel Panic wrote:The most effective ones are the monochromatic ones where the letters are distorted, and their edges touch or overlap slightly:

Image


Those are usually not too difficult for humans to read, but current OCR software cannot decipher them.


Usually, I cannot decipher these either. It takes me an average of 45 seconds to tell what the hell I'm supposed to be typing. Then again, I also already have an account and no one's figured out that I'm a spambot yet...

steve wrote:One suggestion was to require all new forum registrations to post in a special "welcome" forum, after which their accounts would be manually unlocked to the rest of the forums if they aren't spambots, and left unactivated if they are. That still requires me to manually activate all new forum members and I'm trying to reduce, not increase my workload.


If this works as intended, it may actually still reduce your workload, in the George Jetson sense of the word 'work.' It should be fairly easy to discern which posts in this theoretical forum are from actual humans instead of spambots, so action would only have to be taken on about 3% of the posts...

I dunno. I still agree with updating phpBB2.
Rick Reuben wrote:You are dumber than week-old donuts.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests