bad brains: minor threat was guilty of being a bunch of arrhythmic white boys.
ha, kidding, i thought their timing was fine.
but seriously, bad brains. there's no use complaining about their later output when minor threat released a grand total of 14 or so songs in their career... so logically this is just a matter of "bad brains early stuff vs minor threat's early stuff [all their stuff]"
bad brains is the better band. more interesting arrangements, the musicianship was more volatile and unpredictable, and they had a versatility (the reggae angle) that played to their advantage really well -- those were good reggae tunes and somehow it made sense that they were on the same cd as hardcore songs.
the only way i could see someone voting for minor threat is if you really, really like to sing along to those songs. and i don't blame you, they were quite an anthemic, sing-along band with great lyrics and a great frontman. but thats the one thing they had that bad brains couldn't do - the anthemic quality.
pet fever detector wrote:the only hardcore band i would have a hard time picking bad brains over is void.
void is on a level with bad brains. but the following hardcore bands ain't no slouches either: amebix, black flag, antisect, discharge, doom, poison idea, nation of ulysses, doa, misery, early (hardcore) neurosis, deviated instinct, aus rotten, early napalm death, negative approach, and born against... a few of those bands have made songs that rival bad brains, void, or minor threat.