Page 4 of 4
Film: Bram Stoker s Dracula
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:02 pm
by Mazec_Archive
You guys are pretty harsh. Last time I saw it, I thought it was pretty good.
I was 13 years old at the time.
Film: Bram Stoker s Dracula
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:04 pm
by Isabelle Gall_Archive
The single worst film I have handed over money to see in a cinema.
I saw it alone on a miserable, unemployed grey afternoon in some shitty shopping centre which still hasn't been bombed yet for some reason. When I came out I was so hungry and numbed that I went to McDonald's.
What a day that was.
Film: Bram Stoker s Dracula
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:06 pm
by Marsupialized_Archive
I gotta say, I caught a bit of it the other day on cable and the Frankenstein with DeNiro is almost as bad as this movie
Film: Bram Stoker s Dracula
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 7:42 pm
by lemur68_Archive
Marsupialized wrote:I gotta say, I caught a bit of it the other day on cable and the Frankenstein with DeNiro is almost as bad as this movie
That was a horrible one. Even as Frankenstein's monster he still does that thing with his face like he's in a goomba movie, and you see his wang for a few seconds too.
Film: Bram Stoker s Dracula
Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 3:15 pm
by HOUSTON_M_Archive
Crap.
Waffles with flies on 'em for the choice of "actor" to play Renfield; there's probably one less Tom Waits album in the world thanks to this film.
Film: Bram Stoker s Dracula
Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 3:30 pm
by Gramsci_Archive
stephensolo wrote:I think Godfather III was perhaps a worse film, at least in the bad acting realm (Sophia Coppola and her nose).
Is GF III slated because the other two are good... It's not that bad.
Anyhoo Dracula was nice because you got to see Sadie Frost's boobies
Her career went "tits up" after this, pardon the pun.
