scott wrote:Pretty sure there have been posts made in the past week or two by people who've been members since 2003 who have fewer posts than you. So if that really was you angle, you're failing. Although, if you post only one or two more times in the next 5 or 10 years, you might find yourself holding that title.
scott wrote:A good way to manage this proactively, all the new accounts that SDP is gonna try and create to keep the nonsense alive, would be to ban all the IP addresses that are known to be proxy/anonymizer addresses. Nobody's got any genuine need to post from them, except people who've had their real IP address banned.
tinycorkscrew wrote:scott wrote:A good way to manage this proactively, all the new accounts that SDP is gonna try and create to keep the nonsense alive, would be to ban all the IP addresses that are known to be proxy/anonymizer addresses. Nobody's got any genuine need to post from them, except people who've had their real IP address banned.
Actually, there are some pretty good reasons to surf anonymously.
steve wrote:scott wrote:A good way to manage this proactively, all the new accounts that SDP is gonna try and create to keep the nonsense alive, would be to ban all the IP addresses that are known to be proxy/anonymizer addresses. Nobody's got any genuine need to post from them, except people who've had their real IP address banned.
You realize there are millions of them, right?
tinycorkscrew wrote:Actually, there are some pretty good reasons to surf anonymously.
so, i guess you never looked at the memberlist? lot's of nonposters. lots.hatemyway wrote:Shit, am I a gimmick?
I was going for the longest membership with the least amount of posts ratio (still active category) record.
I mean 51 posts in 733 days. Thats got to count for something right? Someone has to offset Marsup and That Damned Fly.
Right?
steve wrote:scott wrote:A good way to manage this proactively, all the new accounts that SDP is gonna try and create to keep the nonsense alive, would be to ban all the IP addresses that are known to be proxy/anonymizer addresses. Nobody's got any genuine need to post from them, except people who've had their real IP address banned.
You realize there are millions of them, right?
Here's a great reason.scott wrote:tinycorkscrew wrote:Actually, there are some pretty good reasons to surf anonymously.
Hrm. such as?
Rift Canyon Dreamspwalshj wrote:I have offered you sausage.
scott wrote:steve wrote:scott wrote:A good way to manage this proactively, all the new accounts that SDP is gonna try and create to keep the nonsense alive, would be to ban all the IP addresses that are known to be proxy/anonymizer addresses. Nobody's got any genuine need to post from them, except people who've had their real IP address banned.
You realize there are millions of them, right?
Doesn't anybody have a list of known anonymizer addesses, maybe even straight up blocks of IP adresses, that are ready for import into a php setting? I woulda thought so, but haven't looked into it. I guess if you just banned them one at a time, as they were used, that would take like, millions of seconds. That's only what, like tens of hours of nonstop banning? psssh!!tinycorkscrew wrote:Actually, there are some pretty good reasons to surf anonymously.
Hrm. such as? not arguing, just Bi- curious. I've only ever known one person who needed one, and it was the troll at a forum I used to post at.
otisroom wrote:scott wrote:steve wrote:scott wrote:A good way to manage this proactively, all the new accounts that SDP is gonna try and create to keep the nonsense alive, would be to ban all the IP addresses that are known to be proxy/anonymizer addresses. Nobody's got any genuine need to post from them, except people who've had their real IP address banned.
You realize there are millions of them, right?
Doesn't anybody have a list of known anonymizer addesses, maybe even straight up blocks of IP adresses, that are ready for import into a php setting? I woulda thought so, but haven't looked into it. I guess if you just banned them one at a time, as they were used, that would take like, millions of seconds. That's only what, like tens of hours of nonstop banning? psssh!!tinycorkscrew wrote:Actually, there are some pretty good reasons to surf anonymously.
Hrm. such as? not arguing, just Bi- curious. I've only ever known one person who needed one, and it was the troll at a forum I used to post at.
FYO
otisroom wrote:Wait, what's a gimmick account?
Should I have one? Do all the cool kids have one?
Why am I so clueless about these things?
Return to “General Discussion”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests