36
by total_douche_Archive
VaticanShotglass wrote:Does anyone have experience with social workers? I've never had experience as a client, but I am enrolled in a BSW program (full disclosure: I am in the very early stages, as in a first-year student, so my knowledge is somewhat limited to basic ideas, and misrepresenting my level of knowledge would be a huge code of ethics violation, so I won't). In that vein, I have a fair amount of experience with them, because my professors are practicing social workers. I can give you an idea of what they do from my class notes.Basically, the job of the social worker, if they're doing their job, is to help the client set and meet goals (i.e. implement a planned change process). The big thing is connecting clients to services. They use all kinds of neat terms like person-in-environment (acknowledging that people affect their environment and environments affect people) and spend a lot of time thinking in shades of grey, thinking about systems, and drawing circles. They work not only with clients, but also as agents of systematic change.Their #1 priority - literally section 1.01 in the Code of Ethics - is the primacy of client interest. They are not dudes with pills and plans. Their job isn't to judge you and throw their idea of what you should do at you. Their job is to help you do what's best for you. Part of this is respecting the client's right to self-determination (except in cases where there are compelling professional reasons to violate this - you know, like a client who is, beyond a shadow of a reasonable doubt, going to commit suicide). Another part of this is respecting the client's right to confidentiality (See Jaffee v Redmond - same privilege rights as doctors and lawyers) except in cases where there is a duty to warn (see Tarrasof v U of CA - basically, if you tell them you're going to murder someone, or beat your kid, or, in some states where the law says so, give someone AIDS, or other things of that nature, they have a duty to break confidentiality). In other words, they're there to tell you what services are available to you, to help you set goals for yourself, and help you implement plans for action. They will (should) respect your right to make your own decisions, your right to confidentiality, and, unless they're really into violating the COE, will go over all of this with you as part of getting informed consent (big thing). At the same time, they will be doing what they can to make the system less fucked up. It's a professional obligation.But... here's where Janeway is both right and wrong (you can be both, shades of grey, neat, huh?): who can be called a social worker depends, to a degree, on who they work for. At least in some states, maybe all, I don't know, county social workers don't have to be licensed or hold a degree. That covers the random person with a title part. On the other hand, being a state-licensed/certified (whether they're licensed or certified depends on the state) social worker requires, at a bare minimum, a BSW from a program accredited by the CSWE. Literally every CSWE-accredited BSW program in the United States has the same content and requirements. They take this stuff very seriously, because social workers can have a lot of authority and have, in the past, taken part in oppressing people. BSWs are always supervised, usually by an MSW. And even an MSW isn't sufficient to practice without supervision, they have to have two years of field experience and apply for independent licensure and pass another test to get said licensure. They don't hand out social work qualifications like they do in business school.Mind, no profession's standards can catch every bad egg. But the standards in social work are fairly high. Janeway is also totally right about finding a worker whose personality fits your needs. Suggest reading a bit at NASW's website.