spoot wrote:I think we have a clear winner so far:
during sound check the other band had an amp break and asked seeley to borrow one. they would only do it for all of the bands drink tickets.
That blows my mind.
i don't know that i'd call that a *clear* winner. other than their amp having broken, which is obviously nobody's fault, the only setback the band borrowing the amp suffered is that they had to actually pay for any drinks they had that night.
the guy crying to get slots switched (against what the venue had advertised!) caused several people who had driven into the city to miss our set entirely. the band's singer/songwriter had driven in from missourri to play this show. his parents had pre-ordered tickets, and drove in about an hour from st charles on a sunday night, just in time to catch our last 2 songs only. several people missed our set entirely.
i'd say that being a little baby and throwing weight around (i.e. "i'm promoting my album on a big-name record label, you guys have NOTHING!") in order to fuck over any number of people, personally i'd say that's way worse than giving someone a chance to use and/or break your amp so long as they get you drunk.
i can say without question that every guy in the band would've given up our drink tickets if that somehow would've allowed us to play in the time slot that was ours up until an hour before the show started.
maybe it's because it adversely affected me or something. but i'd say that a guy that makes a big effort and goes out of his way to fuck people over for his own gain is way worse than a guy that will only do you a favor if he gets compensated for his risk.
LVP wrote:If, say, 10% of lions tried to kill gazelles, compared with 10% of savannah animals in general, I think that gazelle would be a lousy racist jerk.