Webster Tarpley stomped both Hannity and Colmes tonight, and when he
wasn't being shouted over and attacked personally, got out all the important facts concerning WTC7 to the drones who watch that propaganda fest.
you tube video of the great Tarpley
The 9-11 Cover Up Ends: July 9, 2008
302clocker bob wrote:
Ha ha.
Not to trivialize or anything but look at her earrings. The puppetmasters don't ever quit with the symbolism.
The 9-11 Cover Up Ends: July 9, 2008
303Something I grabbed from a different forum that does a better job than I have done of explaining that the fine dust created by the demolition of the towers could not have been created by gravity or 'colliding concrete'. Only explosives could have reduced the concrete to such tiny particles.
Keep dreaming if you think falling concrete turns to fine powder. Look at a controlled demolition if you want to see fine dust produced by a building's destruction.
The 50 micron 45% silicon fine powder DISPROVES that the WTC was demolished by gravity energy, because there is no other way than explosive energy to create such a fine silicon powder from intact concrete and glass in the less than 15 seconds that the WTC towers went from whole to pieces, therefore no spin doctor nor lying expert can convince CRITICAL THINKING people that the WTC was demolished by gravity energy.
If you go to an engineering school or concrete manufacturer and watch them break an INTACT piece of concrete, you will notice that it breaks into sand sized particles, and that in order to turn it into a 50 micron fine powder you would have to MILL those particles.
Even if you drop concrete from 30,000 feet ( jet crusing altitude ), it will still fail into sand size particles- just like you cannot make flour from wheat kernels by dropping them off a tall building!
Even if you put more than X pounds of weight on a cubic inch of concrete that has a compression strength X pounds per inch, it will still fail into sand size particles, just like you cannot make flour from wheat kernels by setting them under a heavy rock!
The reason you cannot make fine powders simply by dropping material, is that the material's collision with the ground results in the small particles recoiling upward instead of them being breaking into smaller and smaller pieces, no matter how much FORCE they hit the ground with.
The reason you cannot make fine powders simply by setting weight on material, is that the surfaces are not perfectly even, so small particles lay in the hills and the valleys between the surfaces, therefore they CANNOT be broken into smaller particles because NO FORCE is being applied to them, no matter how much FORCE is being applied to surfaces.
MILLING can be done by the scraping of abrasives which chew off one fine powder particle at a time, or done by the crushing of surfaces that are SMOOTHER than the desired fine powder particle size.
Since the environment in the demolished WTC towers was not like a MILL, and MILLING always takes more than 15 seconds to generate an appreciable amount of fine powder, WE KNOW FOR A FACT THAT THE 50 MICRON 45% SILICON FINE POWDER THAT IS GIVING THE FIRST RESPONDERS SILICOSIS LUNG DISEASE HAD TO BE CREATED BY EXPLOSIVES, BECAUSE THERE IS NO OTHER WAY FOR THAT POWDER TO BE CREATED IN THE TIME AND ENVIRONMENT OF A DEMOLISHING WTC TOWER.
I will give my house, car, money, clothes, and every worldly possession to the first person lying expert or otherwise who can turn an intact piece of concrete or glass into a 50 micron fine powder in less than 15 seconds without explosives, even though they would not need my money, because they will have won a Nobel prize and would have a zillion dollar patent for making milling obsolete!
So if you choose to believe the official LIE, and ignore the TRUTH that the WTC towers were brought down with explosives, by IGNORING the IRREFUTABLE evidence that the critical thinker has given you, it simply means your emotions overrule your logic, and your psyche cannot handle the ramifications of this IRREFUTABLE evidence, so you close your eyes and keep believing that it was not an inside job when the evidence OBVIOUSLY says otherwise.
Keep dreaming if you think falling concrete turns to fine powder. Look at a controlled demolition if you want to see fine dust produced by a building's destruction.
The 9-11 Cover Up Ends: July 9, 2008
305Yes, but thanks for bumping it. I posted it about a week ago:
http://www.electrical.com/phpBB2/viewto ... 290#414290
There's no doubt that warnings were issued about WTC7 beginning at noon, and there's audio and video of cops telling onlookers that they were clearing a radius because the building was being 'taken down'. Not 'in danger of falling on its own', but about to be taken down. There is video of a NYC cop in his squad telling people that they had to keep four blocks back because the building was going to 'blow up'- those were his exact words. Combine all that with the Silverstein quotes about 'pull it' and the early CNN and BBC reports that WTC7 had collapsed, 25 minutes too soon, and you have a strong body of evidence that the building's demolition was not a random surprise event.
But whatever, this forum's shills will continue to screech that the small fires and debris made it come down at a time that was not predicted by anyone on the ground, they'll keep screeching that Silverstein meant 'pull firefighters' when all the mainstream media reports make it clear that the FDNY abandoned that building five or six hours earlier, they'll keep screeching that there were no explosives even though huge blasts are heard on tapes, they'll keep acting like the 9/11 Commission's decision to ignore WTC7 was some innocuous oversight.
A prominent 9/11 truth activist and a reporter for Alex Jones' radio show has received threatening phone calls and death threats after exposing the fact that WTC leaseholder Larry Silverstein got a warning on the morning of 9/11 not to come to work.
We Are Change founder Luke Rudowski is well known in the movement for his prolific demonstrations in New York and most recently for his confrontation with Silverstein's security thugs , one of whom called in a false bomb threat in an attempt to frame the protest group but was later fired.
Another individual from Silverstein's security detail had told previously Rudowski on tape that Silverstein and other members of his family got a warning to to come to work on September 11 before American Airlines Flight 11 hit the north tower of the World Trade Center.
It has since emerged that two other members of Silverstein's family, his son and daughter, both of which worked in the trade towers, were mysteriously "running late" on that same morning.
Rudowski decided to go public today on The Alex Jones Show with the fact that since his confrontation outside the new WTC 7, he has been receiving threatening phone calls as have his friends and family.
"I have been receiving a lot of death threats as have my loved ones and friends close to me have been getting a lot of death threats," said Rudowski, adding that the calls contained personal information that no one else would know unless Rudowski had been under close surveillance.
Rudowski was told "If you know what's good for you you're going to stop," and the callers made it clear that they were aware of Luke's movements, right down to where he was going away for a weekend break, information he had only told a handful of close companions.
here's the audio of Rudowski's appearance- decide for yourself if he's making these threats up.
The 9-11 Cover Up Ends: July 9, 2008
306clocker bob wrote:This woman is laughing at many of you. She knows you can't lay a glove on her, because you're too terrified to confront these facts about 9/11:
Ha ha.
Actually Bob, that's not the reason we're terrified.
Marsupialized wrote:The last time I saw her, she had some Jewish bullshit going on
ubercat wrote:You're fucking cock-tease aren't you, you little minx.
The 9-11 Cover Up Ends: July 9, 2008
307German TV coverage of Flight 93 and the site in Shanksville ( German language, English subtitles ):
a whole plane into a hole? No, come on- what really happened to that jet?
Lots of pics of the very poor hoax of a 'crash site', plus interviews with the Mayor of Shanksville, who describes the hole without wreckage.
a whole plane into a hole? No, come on- what really happened to that jet?
Lots of pics of the very poor hoax of a 'crash site', plus interviews with the Mayor of Shanksville, who describes the hole without wreckage.
The 9-11 Cover Up Ends: July 9, 2008
308Wild case.
Moving on to what he has to say about 9/11:
full article
rocky mountain news 5-23-07 wrote:Claims of 9/11 conspiracy have suspect running scared
Former Denverite says 9/11 work has made him a target
A former Federal Emergency Management Agency videographer accused of killing his wife in Denver is seeking political asylum in Argentina, claiming the U.S. government wants him silenced for what he saw in the smoldering ruins of the Twin Towers after 9/11.
Kurt Sonnenfeld's efforts to avoid extradition have gained interest from human rights organizations in South America and broad attention from conspiracy theorists on the Internet.
Sonnenfeld, 44, is charged with first-degree murder in the New Year's Day 2002 shooting death of his 36-year-old wife, Nancy, at the couple's home in Congress Park.
The charges against Sonnenfeld were dismissed just before trial in June 2002 after a note written by Nancy Sonnenfeld was found that supported Kurt Sonnenfeld's contention that she took her own life.
New charges were filed in 2004, however, after two Denver jail inmates came forward to say Sonnenfeld had confessed to them during his time in custody. By then, Sonnenfeld had remarried and was living in Argentina.
He has been fighting extradition ever since, describing the warrants against him as "a false pretext for other darker motives."
Moving on to what he has to say about 9/11:
In other interviews with Argentine media, Sonnenfeld is quoted as saying, "What I saw (at 9/11) leads me to the terrible conclusion that there was foreknowledge of what was going to happen - the precautions that were taken to save certain things that the authorities there considered irreplaceable or invaluable.
"For example, certain things were missing that could only have been removed with a truck. Yet after the first plane hit one of the towers, everything in Manhattan collapsed and no one could have gotten near the towers to do that."
Sonnenfeld is quoted as saying documentation was removed from U.S. intelligence agencies in the World Trade Center, including the CIA, prior to the attacks. He did not specify how he could have known that.
Sonnenfeld's allegations have made him a poster child for conspiracy theorists on the Internet, and a number of Web sites use him to bolster their contentions of government involvement in or knowledge about the attacks.
full article
The 9-11 Cover Up Ends: July 9, 2008
309This? This is the best you can do?
Here, I can even clear this one up:
Keep posting nonsense, and I'll keep knocking it down. You can't be trusted to tell the truth on any subject whatsoever.
So, is it your theory that no hijackers were involved? Then how do you explain the flight recordings? How do you explain the flight manifests? How do you explain the phone calls from relatives?
Here, I can even clear this one up:
From www.9/11myths.com wrote:Forensic experts in New York say they have identified body parts of two of the 10 hijackers who flew planes into the World Trade Center on 11 September 2001.
Ellen Borakove, a spokeswoman for the New York Medical Examiner's Office, said the identifications had been made using DNA samples provided by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).
The FBI had collected the DNA from tiny traces of skin on the steering wheels of vehicles hired by the hijackers and from hair samples recovered from their hotel rooms.
Earlier this month, the FBI provided profiles of all 10 hijackers, including alleged ringleader Mohammad Atta, so their remains could be separated from those of victims.
"No names were attached to those profiles. We matched them, and we have matched two of those profiles to remains that we have," Ms Borakove said.
"We haven't finished our work, so it may be more," she added.
(Source) http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/2808599.stm
Keep posting nonsense, and I'll keep knocking it down. You can't be trusted to tell the truth on any subject whatsoever.
So, is it your theory that no hijackers were involved? Then how do you explain the flight recordings? How do you explain the flight manifests? How do you explain the phone calls from relatives?
Gay People Rock
The 9-11 Cover Up Ends: July 9, 2008
310Let's see...
The puppetmaster theory guy gets to answer "I don't know" and the standard theory guy politely accepts that.
The standard theory guy answers "I don't know" and he puppetmaster theory guy starts yelling, interrupting, bullying, and cutting off the standard theory guy to follow up with a related response.
This kind of discussion sounds vaguely familiar...
But I guess all is fair in love and performace art...
The puppetmaster theory guy gets to answer "I don't know" and the standard theory guy politely accepts that.
The standard theory guy answers "I don't know" and he puppetmaster theory guy starts yelling, interrupting, bullying, and cutting off the standard theory guy to follow up with a related response.
This kind of discussion sounds vaguely familiar...
But I guess all is fair in love and performace art...