Ok, joke s over... FUCK Sonic Youth.

321
Colonel Panic wrote:Maybe it would be better to pose these questions on Sonic Youth's message board...


I would love to know how they would react to this debate. I know nothing about that forum other than I'd want no part of a forum based almost exclusively around one band...as opposed to a community (I'm aware that they discuss a wide variety of topics).
kerble wrote:Ernest Goes to Jail In Your Ass

Ok, joke s over... FUCK Sonic Youth.

322
Colonel Panic wrote:But in the end, you're expending your own creative energy on somebody else's project, and that's fine as long as you feel all right about the thing you're promoting. However, if you are trying to do good work promoting something you don't have any confidence in, that's when you start to dread going in to work every day.

Being a designer "expending your own creative energy on somebody else's project" isn't too different from being a recording engineer working on someone else's record. Even if it isn't your favorite band (or organization) it's still your job to do your best for them. It's called being a professional.

Designing a logo for Starbucks is totally different from hanging your paintings on their wall for sale.

Ok, joke s over... FUCK Sonic Youth.

323
Skronk wrote:
Skronk wrote:But there's a definite distinction between working for them and having them release/sell your bands music. We all have to work in this world, and if you choose to work at Starbucks, fine. I doubt anyone would have a problem with that.


tommydski wrote:Isn't there's just as valid an argument saying that working for them serving coffee and working for them writing songs is essentially the same thing?


You think helping them sell coffee by having them sell your music is the same as cleaning up a coffee machine, or sweeping the floors? Come on.

Forget what I think, my opinion isn't important. My post was specifically worded to the effect that there is just as valid argument saying that in both circumstances a payment is being made for a service. Bob Dylan plays the guitar and Johnny Starbucks Employee washes the cups.

I've said I would work for Starbucks if I needed the money and it seems sort of hypocritical for me to say Bob Dylan shouldn't be allowed to do the same.

"Come On" isn't such a comprehensive response. I'm genuinely interested in the reasons why these two things are different because if someone asked me for a reason why it was different, I wouldn't know what to tell them. Tell me now so when I have this discussion on three other message boards, I know what to say.

This isn't aimed at just Skronk, if anyone can explain the difference to me, I'd be very grateful. I'm not being trite or ironic, I really want to know for educational purposes.
run joe run wrote:Kerble your enthusiasm.

Ok, joke s over... FUCK Sonic Youth.

325
tommydski wrote:
Skronk wrote:
Skronk wrote:But there's a definite distinction between working for them and having them release/sell your bands music. We all have to work in this world, and if you choose to work at Starbucks, fine. I doubt anyone would have a problem with that.


tommydski wrote:Isn't there's just as valid an argument saying that working for them serving coffee and working for them writing songs is essentially the same thing?


You think helping them sell coffee by having them sell your music is the same as cleaning up a coffee machine, or sweeping the floors? Come on.

Forget what I think, my opinion isn't important. My post was specifically worded to the effect that there is just as valid argument saying that in both circumstances a payment is being made for a service. Bob Dylan plays the guitar and Johnny Starbucks Employee washes the cups.

I've said I would work for Starbucks if I needed the money and it seems sort of hypocritical for me to say Bob Dylan shouldn't be allowed to do the same.

"Come On" isn't such a comprehensive response. I'm genuinely interested in the reasons why these two things are different because if someone asked me for a reason why it was different, I wouldn't know what to tell them. Tell me now so when I have this discussion on three other message boards, I know what to say.

This isn't aimed at just Skronk, if anyone can explain the difference to me, I'd be very grateful. I'm not being trite or ironic, I really want to know for educational purposes.


The major difference is a) you work for them, as in clean, make coffee, sell muffins, chat with customers.

The other is B) You're an artist who is promoting him/herself through the use of Starbucks, and it's advertising. Your art is now tied into the Starbucks business, which in and of itself, has nothing to do with art.

With b, you are making your art the commodity, like the coffee they are selling. It (your art) ceases to become the end in itself, but becomes a means by which coffee is sold. It is a gimmick to try and get potential customers into their store by offering your art.

Option a has nothing to do with option b, even if it's in the same establishment. Making coffee for a paycheck doesn't amount to selling your art.
Marsupialized wrote:I want a piano made out of jello.
It's the only way I'll be able to achieve the sound I hear in my head.

Ok, joke s over... FUCK Sonic Youth.

327
tommydski wrote:I'm genuinely interested in the reasons why these two things are different because if someone asked me for a reason why it was different, I wouldn't know what to tell them. Tell me now so when I have this discussion on three other message boards, I know what to say.

Try reading them my response. Unless you'd rather just persist in saying two obviously different things are "the same." In which case, go right ahead.
steve albini
Electrical Audio
sa at electrical dot com
Quicumque quattuor feles possidet insanus est.

Ok, joke s over... FUCK Sonic Youth.

328
steve wrote:
unarmedman wrote:So what can bands do? What are non-douche money makers, so startup bands and bands like Sonic Youth?


Normal shit like having a job, playing gigs and selling records. Normal shit that doesn't involve throwing your lot in with a bunch of douchebags you probably hate anyway.



Right, well I get this is what most startup bands do (the having a job part).

So what do career musicians do besides sell records & tour?

steve wrote:This is a phony proposition. You assume we have a problem with Sonic Youth making money.


No, I really don't think this, I assume that folks have a problem with Sonic Youth working with douchebags. However, it always seems in that 'counter culture mentality' (indie cred, whatever people will call it), that corporations are for the most part douchebag enterprises. So any band that wants to work with a corporation is going to wind up working with a douchebag.

Maybe the better question is "Are there any non-douchebag corporations out there?" And I'm not trying to be phony or bait with these questions, I'm really asking on something of which I don't know much. I have done touring/etc. like many of you have.

(I would also hope that it would be universally accepted that a company that kidnaps kids and makes them into sausage is worse than starbucks. :shock: )
"The best argument against democracy is a five minute conversation with the average voter."
-Winston Churchill

Ok, joke s over... FUCK Sonic Youth.

329
Keep in mind that this is the same Thurston Moore who routinely says things like this in interviews. Such as:

(Index Magazine interview 1998):

JUTTA: Why did the band start its own label?
THURSTON: It was created because we were recording a lot of music. We figured we were going to record a lot more than can fit on an album. And the way we make albums - the way most people make albums - is they're thematic in nature. So we didn't want to just flood the album with music. But the SYR releases and the purported Geffen record sort of inform each other. We don't really have a distinction between the two.
KIM: We do, in a way. I mean, there are some things that are set aside ...
THURSTON: We have a song called "Hits of Sunshine." That will definitely be on the Geffen record. We decided that. In fact, maybe we should call the album Hits of Sunshine.
KIM: No.
THURSTON: I'm telling you, man, if we're going to go on tour with Phish ...
KIM: It's too flower hippies.
THURSTON: But you have to buy into flower hippies because flower hippies are the only way we're going to make money in the future.
JUTTA: Oh, good.
THURSTON: Because Phish sell millions. We sell hundreds. We have to sell millions.
JUTTA: Phish?
KIM: Do they sell millions? I think they have lots of people coming to their concerts.
THURSTON: No, they sell millions. They've usurped the Grateful Dead's audience, which is the audience that we should have usurped, but we weren't as clever as them.
KIM: So this is all about making money?
THURSTON: This is all about making money.
JUTTA: Oh, I see. Is that a driving force?
THURSTON: Money? Not creatively. But it's a driving force for ambitions. I want to tour with Phish because the kind of music we make is more in tune with their aesthetic than it is with any K-Rock or Geffen rock aesthetic. So it's only fair to us, and to that audience. We deserve each other. And I think we can expand their horizon, although they can do nothing for us.


and

JUTTA: And what about the Ecstatic Peace label?
THURSTON: It's exciting but it's a drag because, again, that's why we have to make more money. It's draining our bank account. I mean, it's fun but it's expensive. Money doesn't really come back very readily from putting records out. So you know what I would like to do - and I think I'm going to do this - is appeal to the people at Microsoft to give me a label.
JUTTA: Why would they have a label?
THURSTON: Because I think Microsoft is looking to go into the entertainment business.
KIM: They're going to start putting music out.
THURSTON: They already have a label called Gold Circle. So I'm going to try to get into the Microsoft camp.
KIM: I think we can get Microsoft as a sponsor of SYR.
THURSTON: I mean, they're just swimming in green.
JUTTA: That's a good title for an album. There's so much concern there - Swimming in Green.
KIM: You know the time you saw us play in Rita's bedroom? I liked that because afterwards I could lay down on the bed and listen to other people playing, which is always my fantasy. Most gigs, you just feel like lying down and listening to the music.
JUTTA: You mean, when you're standing on stage you're ...
KIM: No, when I go to other people's shows.
THURSTON: I agree. It would be nice to lie down while they're playing.
JUTTA: It rarely happens.
THURSTON: Yeah, comfort clubs - that's a great idea for Microsoft to back.
Last edited by NerblyBear_Archive on Mon Jun 18, 2007 5:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Ok, joke s over... FUCK Sonic Youth.

330
Big John wrote:Is the woman from dawson's creek with the short blonde hair, the one that was in brokeback mountain? She is shooting a movie in front of my house with the guy who played capote and the gal who played his kill a mockingbird sidekick. It is being directed by the guy who wrote being john malkavitch and spotless mind. Pretty deconstructed set (scaffolding everywhere with scrims and outlines on them) maybe they are doing a lot of cg. it is called Phycodoche or something like that. If I am out later and she is sitting on my stairs again I will ask her.



AArgh! Synecdoche, New York. I am really looking forward to this movie. Get the hell out of this ridiculous thread and sit by the set.

Or something!
HELLO!

Rodabod wrote:Post "hilarious" forum quote here.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests