Richard Dawkins Accepts Possibility Of Intelligent Design

391
Rick Reuben wrote:
Gramsci wrote: It tells us humans and apes share a common ancestor,
That doesn't mean anything- just because apes and humans are siblings doesn't mean that the genetic composition of humans was never altered by outsiders. Nothing that is currently known about evolution rules out that possibility.


except that there is zero evidence that said outsiders exist.
To me Steve wrote:I'm curious why[...] you wouldn't just fuck off instead. Let's hear your record, cocksocket.

Richard Dawkins Accepts Possibility Of Intelligent Design

399
Rick Reuben wrote:
enframed wrote:except that there is zero evidence that said outsiders exist.
There is evidence that we simple humans can't see them or find them.

Rick, that is an incorrect statement. There is no evidence that we cannot see them or find them, because there is no evidence that "they" really exist in the first place.

Absence of evidence is not evidence. Evidence does not exist until it is observed by an interested party. That's the definition of the word "evidence", something that is "evident". That which cannot be perceived cannot be evidence, because it ain't fucking evident!

If humans cannot see or find any evidence of extraterrestrial life, then you Bob/Rick, being human, are equally limited in this faculty as the rest of us humans. Therefore, you have no reasonable, truthful ground to assert that such things exist beyond all our abilities to perceive them. The best you can assert is that you do not know, either.

You persist in using the same ridiculous denialist logic over and over in almost every post you make. I can't believe you don't understand the most basic rudiments of logical thinking.
Last edited by Colonel Panic_Archive on Wed Apr 23, 2008 2:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Richard Dawkins Accepts Possibility Of Intelligent Design

400
Rick Reuben wrote:
Gramsci wrote:The search function isn't really that hard to use.

Rick Reuben wrote:If there is any validity to the 'Satanic bloodlines' theories, then it's likely that actual descendents of crossbreeding between humans and 'fallen angels' make up a very thin percentage of those involved in elite control.

So you lied. Thanks for confirming that. Do they not teach the word 'if' in your native hemisphere?

gramsci wrote:Bob has stated that he thinks that the world is controlled by a demon-human hybrid.

Fix that quote or I'm contacting the moderator.


So by "if" Bob means 'there is a possibly" and by "very thin percentage" he doesn't mean zero percentage.

It's great he cleared that one up. He could choose to deny the whole possibility but chooses to pin flag on this as a possibility...

I suppose we can draw whatever conclusions we want from this exercise in double-think.
Reality

Popular Mechanics Report of 9-11

NIST Investigation of the World Trade Center Disaster

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests