Premier Rock Forum

ginandtacos.com wrote:2. Banners. Bands playing in front of a large banner bearing their name and/or "logo" cannot possibly be good. This is science.

d865 wrote:

Roadie poppin' zimas and lining them up

That's when I reach for my revolver.

if anyone in the band is under 30 years old and not drinking beer at all they are probably gonna suck.

if the band members look like they would have nothing to do with each other outside of the band.

Marsupialized wrote:A male with long blonde hair.

Come on.

Loincloth, man, loincloth. But since this band is so evasive, you would never accidentally run into them and not know what you were in for.

See, the thing is, the people with racks don't have 12 cymbals either. The douchebag I saw on Thursday, for example, had a rack (and a FULL rack, all three sides) with 4 cymbals. Four. And. AND. The goddamn rack toms were mounted on the bass drum. So let's recap:

3-sided rack - about 75 pounds and $300-400
Equipment supported by rack: 4 cymbals

I don't see any problems here. Do you?

dontfeartheringo wrote:

ginandtacos.com wrote:1. Drum racks. Whenever I see a drum rack, I immediately understand that it is 99.6% likely that the drummer can't play the fucking drums one lick. Drum racks, which are heavy, bulky, and inconvenient, are purchased exclusively by gear-obsessed people who spend more time polishing cymbals than practicing. Racks = impending suck.

Yes. Exactly.

These things are for douchebags. Did John Bonham have one? Fuck no.

Why would anyone want to play in one of these handicapped toilets? Because they have 12 cymbals? Did John Bonham have 12 cymbals? FUCK NO.

I hate these things.
HATE.

Josef K wrote:Make-up

Hey!

Frank Decent wrote:Sandals on stage.
Pony tails.
Pointy guitars

Get the fuck out.

Hey!!

ginandtacos.com wrote:

Pasta wrote:Pirate costumes....

Any costumes.

Hey!

Marsupialized wrote:A male playing an acoustic guitar.

Come on.

Come On?