Rick Reuben wrote:

Heeby Jeeby wrote:WTC 1 & 2. Hit by planes, flown by Islamist terrorists..

You left out an explanation for how kerosense weakens steel to the point that the two buildings' caps and all the floors beneath them exploded into chopsticks and aerosolized concrete, leaving not stacks of pancaked floors ( as you would expect from a gravity collapse ) but a three story pile of rubble and steel and dust ejected laterally for blocks.

The planes did that?

You haven't really looked at any of this.

Molten metal pouring out of the side of WTC1. Impossible for a jet fuel fire to cause that.

Shanksville. The 'crash site' of a passenger jet?

About the biggest piece of debris at the Pentagon:

Alright we're on to something here. No insults or nothing.

I got a couple of genuine questions then that I would like answered.

With regards WTC1 and WTC2 what do you believe was the chain of events? Planes flown in as a ruse, while the real damage was done by explosives planted in the building?

The 'Flight 93 crash' site at Shanksville...whats your take on that? Plane disintegrated after missile strike or wasn't a plane at all?

The Pentagon...what hit that? If you think it was a missile why would they do that? If they had the ability to remotely fly large planes in to buildings why risk using a missile instead?

Heeby Jeeby, as you may notice Bob will not reply directly to you past his string of insults. He will likely edit his posts and spam the thread with copies of his original screed so it appears after your (serious) reply to him.

Just copy-paste your original reply until he gets bored and leaves for another webpage.

tl;dr

A friend of mine's brother-in-law and his wife were on the plane that went into the Pentagon. I didn't know them personally, but this friend would get pretty upset when the whole missile theory was brought up.

Thanks for that. One thing I forgot to ask was why WTC7 would be taken down. I've heard various things about what was stored there but no concrete reason as to why they'd bring down that particular building...

BTW I agree with most of the shit you've said there i.e. Shanksville doesn't look like a crash site of a large passenger plane. The lack of videos of the Pentagon hit is very strange - I thought maybe they didn't want to release it because it might prove a propaganda tool but thats surmising with no evidence to back it up.

big_dave wrote:9/11 was Caused by terrorists.

This is actually true, but not in the way that i think you meant it.

Karen Johnson, the homophobic Republican bigot? I'm sure she has as much credibility on this forum as does Jesse Ventura. Keeping strivin' for intellectual puberty, kid.

Rick Reuben wrote:

murderedman wrote:A friend of mine's brother-in-law and his wife were on the plane that went into the Pentagon. I didn't know them personally, but this friend would get pretty upset when the whole missile theory was brought up.

Do they get upset about the fact that a clear video that would retire this theory has been withheld by the government?

I don't even understand why they would 'get upset' about a theory. What does the theory imply about their family? That they're somehow not dead, or that their death does not matter? There's no connection.

The government has not provided the necessary evidence to quell skepticism. Don't blame the skeptics, blame your government.

So are you of the belief that a missile, and not a 757, hit the Pentagon?

Because if so, I should direct you to your friend, Michael Rivero.

Rick Reuben wrote:

Rick Reuben wrote:Do they get upset about the fact that a clear video that would retire this theory has been withheld by the government?

The government has not provided the necessary evidence to quell skepticism. Don't blame the skeptics, blame your government.

dr geek wrote:So are you of the belief that a missile, and not a 757, hit the Pentagon?

Are you unable to understand that my complaint is over the lack of evidence for the 757?

So is the evidence presented in the link I posted on the last page not enough for you?

Rick Reuben wrote:

Dr. Geek wrote:So is the evidence presented in the link I posted on the last page not enough for you?

Is there video of a jetliner swooping in on one of the most highly-surveilled buildings on the planet at that link? If not, then I'll keep waiting.

So you have not gone over what is presented on the site I linked? And if you have, how do you refute the evidence that is presented within?