kerble wrote:because until you get the full story, it's good form to not drag anyone's name through the mud.
also, fuck off.
i think the first post had enough information to warrant the name of the magazine right off the bat
i realize that a lot of people seem to be siding with the dude who runs this magazine and standing up for him, but that's not really a good reason to not drop the name in the first place. i'm sure steve nash or bridges or whatever the hell his name is (can't remember right now) is a fine upstanding man but i mean he's constantly soliciting bands to be on his comp, and we have every right to know if he drops the ball once in a while. (or is "spreading himself too thin" or however Friends Of Steve want to put it)