Display posts from previous
Sort by

Ann Coulter Calls Obama s Autobiography Black Mein Kampf

52 by simmo_Archive
Don't get me wrong, Coulter is an evil, loathable cunt, but I find it worrying that every time she comes up on this board people suggest she should be raped or "hatefucked". There are plenty of male conservatives spewing identical hateful bile, but people's reaction to her is to advocate sexual violence. Reveals something very dark and unpleasant, don't you think?
Rick Reuben wrote:
daniel robert chapman wrote:I think he's gone to bed, Rick.
He went to bed about a decade ago, or whenever he sold his soul to the bankers and the elites.


Image

Ann Coulter Calls Obama s Autobiography Black Mein Kampf

53 by houseboat_Archive
simmo wrote:Don't get me wrong, Coulter is an evil, loathable cunt, but I find it worrying that every time she comes up on this board people suggest she should be raped or "hatefucked". There are plenty of male conservatives spewing identical hateful bile, but people's reaction to her is to advocate sexual violence. Reveals something very dark and unpleasant, don't you think?


Well said.

Some of the posts in this thread are noxious.

Ann Coulter Calls Obama s Autobiography Black Mein Kampf

54 by numberthirty_Archive
clocker bob wrote:
AAAAAAAARGH wrote:I'm curious as to why you posted this thread, bob?
I wanted to see how many people completely ignored every point made by Coulter and instead, made replies that either insulted Coulter or fantasized about beating her/raping her.

After reading all the sellout liberals buy Obama's 'historic race speech' hook, line and sinker, I realized that the globalists had successfully built another Trojan horse for clueless progressives. Now that the only real candidate of change has been successfully locked out of the process, I can return to watching politics as theater. I'm mostly interested in seeing how many liberals I can get to tell me that Obama the Emperor has clothes. I want the liberals to deify Obama for me. Clearly, few liberals are prepared to see a single wart on him, so great is their desire for a wart-free idol. It is utterly inconceivable that Obama could have been completely in the dark about the content of all Pastor Wright's sermons, and it's equally inconceivable that he hadn't expressed similar complaints about American society with Wright in private, but all that was ignored. Obama told you that he hadn't heard or seen nothing, right to your faces, and the sellout liberals swallowed it all, and happily. Their idol emerged from the storm without a scratch. They cheered the lies.

I then wanted to see if I could get some of the liberals to jump to Obama's defense over this, just like they did with the recent Pat Buchanan column I posted. I'm fascinated by fake liberals who see a vote for Obama as a vote for change. He's completely owned and operated by arch-globalist financiers, as his 'historic race speech' demonstrated- Obama confirmed he would say anything he was told to say and Obama confirmed that he would play the game completely according to the elite's rules and Obama confirmed that he would respect all the sacred cows and taboos that are enforced by the elite media and moneymen. Change results from substantive policy changes; it does not result from being young, new, and with a darker skin color. That just means that Obama is young, new, and has a darker skin color.

Liberals have convinced themselves that a vote for Obama is a vote that ends racism, poverty, hate and injustice, and they desperately cling to the idea that a vote for Obama plants a halo over their heads, as if they were rising above the same old shit. That's really what it's all about for fake liberals- in their heads, it's "How good does this vote for Obama make me look?"Sorry, but you're all voting for the same old shit. Obama is a complete media creation from the same factory that brought you Bill Clinton. He sells snake oil to sellouts. Dear liberals: Obama is not change. His handlers are the same old shadowy hustlers who have placed predatory Wall Street speculators in control of your economy, gutted the middle class, and let Big Brother dig his teeth into your constitution.The same hustlers who will continue to manage your minds with fear, propaganda, and divisive peripheral bullshit.

Pied Piper Obama. Liberals are convinced that a vote for Obama says great things, about them. Obama is a vessel for what is, at its essence, the love that liberals feel for themselves. If you're a liberal, an Obama vote is the easiest, least courageous vote imaginable, because all it does is prolong the self-induced comas that excuse you all from confronting the only real issues: the perpetual wartime economy, the perpetual reckless monetary expansion and deficit spending, and the perpetual mind control machine of elite media.

An Obama vote offers liberals instant gratification and instant relief, because the globalist media instantly showers liberals with profuse praise for their 'forward-thinking' choice ( while the media controllers enjoy a hearty laugh among themselves about how easily they selected another candidate for you, once you're all out of earshot ). That's fine, liberals. Take your Political Prozac from Obama, take your antacid. Your country has an ulcer. Go ahead and mask it until it bursts right through your stomach lining.

Dear Barack Obama: your Teflon overcoat is ready. Liberals have tailored it for you. You are free to spew all the gauzy tame bullshit you want and have it celebrated as 'revolutionary'. Few liberals will ever call you on any of it, because their investment in the myth of *Obama* is deep and evangelical. People buy into myths because to accept the truth requires soul-searching and introspection; the liberals continue to buy the myths of globalization and debt money and 9/11 and so on, because to reject the myths exposes their own complicity in the march towards the cliff of economic ruin and a police state.

The liberals have to react with extreme fury against anyone who points out to them that Obama is not and could not be real change, because, from their prison inside the false left/right paradigm, Obama is the only horse they've got. Liberals must defend the mirage of change promised by Obama, and they must loudly insist that a true candidate of change can be found on the roster of approved candidates selected for them by the controllers. Against all facts, the sellout liberals must insist this.


People are ignoring her "Points" for the same reason they usually ignore your "Points" They aren't points at all. What they are is the same old nonsense over and over until it makes folks want to puke.

A point would be something that would take place in an exchange of ideas between people who wanted to actually think about what the other person was saying. You might even consider that a point someones else is making means you(and some of the things you think) could be wrong. A point also could be part of an intelligent conversation. I don't think you or Ann have ever come within a country mile of one of those.

Ann Coulter Calls Obama s Autobiography Black Mein Kampf

56 by Mark Hansen_Archive
simmo wrote:Don't get me wrong, Coulter is an evil, loathable cunt, but I find it worrying that every time she comes up on this board people suggest she should be raped or "hatefucked". There are plenty of male conservatives spewing identical hateful bile, but people's reaction to her is to advocate sexual violence. Reveals something very dark and unpleasant, don't you think?


She is a female conservative who spews hateful bile, so it shouldn't be too surprising that it gets thrown back at her as well.

Maybe my "Coulterdragger" comment was in poor taste.

I still stand by my "manface" comment.
Available in hit crimson or surprising process this calculator will physics up your kitchen

Ann Coulter Calls Obama s Autobiography Black Mein Kampf

57 by Mark Hansen_Archive
Rick, you have proven nothing that wasn't already known about this forum, that Ann Coulter is almost universally reviled here. In fact, I don't ever remember a positive comment about her on this forum, even from you. It is not surprising at all that she gets the reaction here that she does.

Regarding her "thesis", that Barack's book is some modern day "Mein Kampf", it doesn't hold water.

Hitler took positions that, at least in the circles he ran in, were considered "common knowledge", that were hateful, racist, nationalistic, and xenophobic in character, and wrote a book in which he was influenced by those beliefs, and made them even more hateful, racist, nationalistic, and xenophobic when he reiterated them in his book. He made the beliefs the central point of his public, and most likely, private, character.

Barack heard positions, that, in the circles he was in, were considered "common knowledge", and were hateful, possibly racist, and black nationalistic in character (at least when examined out of context), and then wrote a book (which I admit I haven't read, unlike "Mein Kampf) which did not make these positions anything like a central part of his character, or even a part of his character at all.

Rick, I sincerely doubt many "liberals" expect Barack Obama to be a perfect, unassailable human being, with no warts whatsoever. The Rezko thing is definitely a blemish; the Wright thing, I kind of don't care one iota about.

Liberals think Barack Obama is better than the alternative presented by any possible Republican candidate; they aren't deluded, like you seem to think in your back and white world, that he is perfect in any way.

If I had a say, I would have preferred Kucinich, but that is sadly not who the Democratic candidate is going to be.

If there was a viable third party candidate I could support, who had a real shot at winning, and was not just some symbolic underdog who had no chance of winning, I would consider voting for them.
Last edited by Mark Hansen_Archive on Sun Apr 06, 2008 12:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Available in hit crimson or surprising process this calculator will physics up your kitchen

Ann Coulter Calls Obama s Autobiography Black Mein Kampf

58 by Sid Hartha_Archive
Spoke wrote:
clocker bob wrote:
Sid Hartha wrote:
clocker bob wrote: Liberals have convinced themselves that a vote for Obama is a vote that ends racism, poverty, hate and injustice...

Name one.
clocker bob wrote: Liberals have convinced themselves that a vote for Obama is a vote that heals racism, poverty, hate and injustice...

Better?


no, still makes no sense.

and refers to a group of people who don't exist.

Ann Coulter Calls Obama s Autobiography Black Mein Kampf

59 by clocker bob_Archive
Mark Hansen wrote:Rick, I sincerely doubt many "liberals" expect Barack Obama to be a perfect, unassailable human being, with no warts whatsoever.
When did I say that liberals expect Obama to be perfect? I said that they inflate his good qualities, because they believe that if they exaggerate who he is, they can cover up the fact that they are voting for a tepid cocoction of elite globalists, and they deny that his campaign money makes him the property of the same old power structure that the fake liberals pretend to oppose. If Obama is made to be 'greater' by the sellout liberals, then they feel that their own failure to seek true change by hunting for a candidate who has not been designated for them by the insiders will not be scrutinized. They ignore his bad qualities, because they are out to marry Obama. They're in love.

Just like the guy who loves his wife and doesn't want to see her averageness, the liberals want an Obama vote to be classified as a bold and brave choice, because they themselves want to be showered with the media hype given to Obama. When the liberals hear the controlled media describe the success of Obama as something 'wonderful' for America ( even though it's the same old globalist Wall Street crap ), the liberals are jumping up and down and saying, "Hey! Hey! I'm voting for the guy. That makes me wonderful, too. Tell me I'm wonderful"- and the media answers their pleas, because the media is designed to marry weak-minded liberals to weak, false liberals. And so the false left/right paradigm of false choices is preserved.

The liberals feed their own lust for self-aggrandizement through their promotion of Obama, and their delirious tunnel vision infatuation with the myth of Obama, provided for them by the controllers, creates a feedback loop back to them.

What you will see from liberals is that they only see the world of politics as two shades, conservative and liberal, which is exactly as the controllers want them to see it. The only real division is between the people who are taking more money than they need and the people who are being cheated to make that happen. Conservative/liberal is an overlay that obscures that schism. Look at Steve, pretending to be 'anti-imperialism'. Let's break that down.

To be 'anti-imperialism', one must acknowledge that the US is imperialist. Anti-imperialism is a reaction to an existing condition. If you confirm imperialism, then you must recognize that imperialism is a long-term project. When you look at it long-term, you see that imperialism has progressed under the guidance of moneyed Democrats and moneyed Republicans. The likelihood of a genuine anti-imperialist candidate being offered from the two collaborators behind existing imperialism is next to nil- and yet, liberals like Steve expect to find this anti-imperialist, anti-militarist wearing a Democratic label, and carrying buckets of money from the elites.

What a laugh.

When they see any candidate who is *not supported* by the party insiders and the controlled media and the money crowd, like a Ron Paul or a Ralph Nader, they are unable to accept the invititation to get behind a real anti-imperialist candidate, because they do not really want an end to imperialism!

These liberals have made out well under the current class structure and they intend to continue doing well, so they do not want to rock the boat. They lack the guts to say, as conservatives do, that the system has benefited them just fine and they want to keep it. They have internal enthusiasm for the status quo, but an expressed false revulsion of it. They preach social justice, but vote for neutralized, bought -off candidates who will not provide it.

Instead, the fake liberals pay lip service to making the economy fair, but then only vote inside the false paradigm for approved candidates, because they know that the change ( that they inwardly do not want ) will never come from such compromised candidates. Because, to anyone paying attention, Obama is exposed as another centrist, fake liberals blow a bunch of hot air on him, to exaggerate Obama's liberal credentials, in an effort to polish their own failed liberal credentials.

Ann Coulter Calls Obama s Autobiography Black Mein Kampf

60 by big_dave_Archive
clocker bob wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:Rick, I sincerely doubt many "liberals" expect Barack Obama to be a perfect, unassailable human being, with no warts whatsoever.
the liberals are jumping up and down and saying, "Hey! Hey! I'm voting for the guy. That makes me wonderful, too. Tell me I'm wonderful".


Too much irony.

You've built your entire personality around Alex Jones and Ron Paul, of course you're sure to look like a needy, neurotic nitwit next to people who support Obama warts-n-all for rational reasons.

You have built yourself into an imaginary world where supporting Ron Paul and following far-right conspiracy dogma makes you feel special. To the point where it is apparently your only reason to get up in the morning. Unless you have a really cool dog or a fluffy pussy cat or something.
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests