Page 6 of 19

Is violence in Britain actually increasing?

Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 7:42 pm
by honeyisfunny_Archive
Rick Reuben wrote:
honeyisfunny wrote:To say it's because they're underprivileged is kind of missing the point. Most of the random acts of violence carried out locally to me have no financial motive at all. Someone I know's wife was really badly beaten by a gang of kids (13/14 yrs old) who tried to steal her dog while she walked it.
You're missing the point. Awareness of being underprivileged and living an underprivileged life certainly has much to do with the violence. Violence is fueled by anger at circumstances beyond one's control. Just because these kids don't expect to get rich off a street robbery doesn't mean that they aren't reacting to financial circumstances when they act out.

As the globalists wreck your economy and leave a donut economy without a solid middle class behind, people become cognizant of the extreme bottleneck that they face in their pursuit of the British ( or American ) Dream. They can figure out that they have been conspired against by the elites and that most of them will not find good seats at the table. Add in the incredible level of pharmaceuticals being poured into your kids ( worse than in America, even ) and add in the other assaults on the family structure used to keep the rabble in chaos and attacking each other, and you can see why a new more dangerous generation is here, as planned ( and all ready to scare the older generations into signing off on more surveillance and more police state in the UK, as planned ).

But I'm sure people will still blame the tools of violence ( like guns or knives ) more than the two headed enemy: weak economy and orchestrated psychiatric warfare against the population.

honeyisfunny wrote:Meanwhile the Police force are drinking free coffee in Subway a good 2 miles away. But that's a whole different gripe.

That's funny. A guy with a completely fabricated quote for his .sig is condemning someone else's ethics.


You don't live here. End of debate.

Is violence in Britain actually increasing?

Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 8:25 pm
by dontfeartheringo_Archive
Oh, god, I'm glad you could make it to this thread, Rick.

Seriously, it just wouldn't have been the same without you.

Is violence in Britain actually increasing?

Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 9:50 pm
by JohnnyDoglands_Archive
honeyisfunny wrote:You don't live here. Start of a whole new debate .


FYP

Is violence in Britain actually increasing?

Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 11:25 pm
by Tommy Alpha_Archive
Tommy Alpha wrote:I’m not attempting to stir up any Clocker Bob style rowing


Tommy Alpha wrote:Sigh...

Is violence in Britain actually increasing?

Posted: Sat Jul 05, 2008 4:27 am
by johnnyshape_Archive
Rick Reuben wrote:
johnnyshape wrote:For that matter, find me anything anywhere that blames the actual existence of knives themselves to be the problem.
You yourself stated that the debate was being framed in your media as an arms control debate:
johnnyshape wrote:Having said that, one of the most frequently repeated tenets of the Disarming Britain thing on telly the other night was that not only are people more likely to carry weapons, they are more likely to use them.


No I didn't. I named the title of a TV strand which looked at street violence and why kids carry weapons (the bit I watched, anyway). It, and I, didn't frame anything as an arms control debate. What debate? There isn't a debate here as to whether people should be allowed to carry knives or guns.

You said people will 'blame the tools of violence', when nobody blames the contents of people's kitchen drawers for stabbings.

Is violence in Britain actually increasing?

Posted: Sat Jul 05, 2008 4:47 am
by holmes_Archive
sparky wrote:There's a short analysis on the BBC here which I think is helpful.
Mark Easton on the BBC wrote:Between the years 2002-3 and 2006-7, the number of these children admitted to hospital with knife wounds in England "almost doubled" we are told. From 95 cases to 179. A rise of 88%.

However, over the same period, the numbers of under-16s admitted to hospital with gunshot wounds has gone down from 253 to 181. A fall of 28%.*

So, 84 more children were admitted with stab injuries than five years earlier. But 72 fewer children were admitted with gunshot injuries.


{*= I've manually corrected a typo they corrected later in the article -sparky.}


holmes wrote:i agree, to use poverty as an excuse rather than the fact these people are just fucking scum is a complete cop out. my great great grandfathers worked down bloody coal mines all day and didnt go around stabbing everyone.


I don't like this argument: it is as wrong as saying your gran smoked twenty cigarettes a day and died in a skiing accident when she was 90, hence smoking is not bad for you. As RIII says, you don't see so many middle-class kids going around stabbing each other.

"Fucking scum" is pretty close to old NF talk. Understandable if you've been beaten or mugged (I have along with most of us here, it seems), but still dodgy. And this:

holmes wrote:i think we should just round up these people and fucking kill them.


...is fucked.


your smoking thing is an amazingly stupid comparison, congratulations.

anyway, i some times dont realise severity of the words i use, and i can see how they do seem rather extreme. however, looking back on them never fails to make me laugh, they are sometimes quite outragous. i do however stand by what i meant, i should have just presented it in a nicer manner, and explained myself more thouroughly. i know you wouldnt believe it but i am very left in a lot of my views. i am a very nice person really, i just dont see how i cant make certain arguments without certain dickeads i assuming i sleep on an autobiography of stalin. but thats another discussion.

on a more serious note, i certainly dont like being compared to the fucking national front, and considering that you live in berlin, and i assume do not have regularlar visits to the crappier parts of our fair cities in england, i dont see how you could have much knowledge or apreciation of how our society is changing in tone and outlook - particularly amongst young adults in these places there is a genuine lack of empathy, that is completly alien on such a scale to even 10 or so years ago. i dont think its all just media hype, in fact i am saying it from first hand experience having spent time in these areas and having been in contact with these people unlike, i am fairly sure, most people here.

to answer someone else here, these crap areas have always been shit, it is not 'poor people' in general that i am talking about, it is some select people that commit these crimes, soulless, disgusting, evil fuckers, and frankly i do think they should be killed. i get very fustrated when people cop out and then say stupid things like 'well why dont we just kill all the poor then and anyone else who commits a crime', in a sarcky way to make it sound like you are a right wing lunatic. thats not what i mean at all, and i hope people here do not think i mean anything like that. just certain rotten remorseless repeat offenders should be fucking executed.

also, i hope you apreciated that the book i was sleeping on in this little story was a stalin autobiography and not a hitler one. we dont want to get the n word mentioned in this thread to early on do we?

Is violence in Britain actually increasing?

Posted: Sat Jul 05, 2008 5:52 am
by sparky_Archive
holmes wrote:your smoking thing is an amazingly stupid comparison, congratulations.


Not really, no.

holmes wrote:on a more serious note, i certainly dont like being compared to the fucking national front, and considering that you live in berlin, and i assume do not have regularlar visits to the crappier parts of our fair cities in england, i dont see how you could have much knowledge or apreciation of how our society is changing in tone and outlook


You'd be wrong there. I was born in Lewisham and have lived in and around London and environs for most of my life and have lived in my fair share of feisty areas: Plumstead, Brockley (posher now, I believe), Sutton, Bethnal Green and Camberwell. Violence wise, I've only been mugged, and got a pretty puny punch in the back of my head for my troubles.

holmes wrote:on a more serious note, i certainly dont like being compared to the fucking national front


You might not like it, but your words gave that impression: full of hate. I'm don't like the cold children and young men who commit these crimes, but I wouldn't say they are utterly lost causes. And your argument of

holmes wrote:just certain rotten remorseless repeat offenders should be fucking executed


...seems to call for some kind of human culling. Leading on from which:

holmes wrote:also, i hope you apreciated that the book i was sleeping on in this little story was a stalin autobiography and not a hitler one. we dont want to get the n word mentioned in this thread to early on do we?


I take this to be a reference to the fact that you assumed that I am German and hence thought a Hitler reference would be hilarious. Yes, well done with that.

Is violence in Britain actually increasing?

Posted: Sat Jul 05, 2008 6:49 am
by Tommy Alpha_Archive
sparky wrote:I was born in Lewisham


Nudge, idrin.

sparky wrote:Brockley (posher now, I believe)


Actually still pretty rough. My ex-girlfriend got lamped in the eye and her phone nicked there. The 'Brockley Boys' are a pretty notorious violent gang and I was sussed (pretty much what it is again) by the police for walking past a notorious drug house and having my hood up in the rain. Only thing thats different is that are more white young professionals there too. Oh, and a shit bar.

Is violence in Britain actually increasing?

Posted: Sat Jul 05, 2008 6:54 am
by Tommy Alpha_Archive
Rick Reuben wrote:
Tommy Alpha wrote:I’m not attempting to stir up any Clocker Bob style rowing

Tommy Alpha wrote:I’m not attempting to stir up any Clocker Bob style rowing or idea of a media conspiracy,
Interesting how you trimmed your own quote. You raised the spectre of a media conspiracy. Of course there is evidence of a media conspiracy- what do you think, the media is there to give you the straight news?? They're there to manipulate the viewers. About five people in the thread spoke against the media before I even got to the thread- I just amplified on it. And if you've got a media conspiracy, where do you think it begins? In the minds of the very rich people who run your country and control your media and instruct their minions to design sensationalist coverage of street violence.

Why would you not want to stir up talk of a media conspiracy?? It's staring you in your face.


You see... this is why I can’t have nice things!

*sobs*

In all seriousness, I’m not prepared to be dragged into this. The thread’s been Bob’d, I guess that means it’s over.

Is violence in Britain actually increasing?

Posted: Sat Jul 05, 2008 6:55 am
by honeyisfunny_Archive
Rick Reuben wrote:
honeyisfunny wrote:You don't live here. End of debate.
Says a jibbering fool who claims to have studied 9/11 ( a US event)


I think 9/11 affected a few more countries than America.

holmes wrote:... particularly amongst young adults in these places there is a genuine lack of empathy, that is completly alien on such a scale to even 10 or so years ago


That's a very good way of wording it. I wish I'd said that as you've hit the nail on the head. It really is a complete absence of empathy with fellow people.

Rick Reuben wrote:honeyisfunny says the kids act out because they perceive 'no ceiling on their behavior'- which is a direct suggestion that the kids know they can carry weapons and use them.


I didn't mean it quite like that. I meant that, in the city I live in anyway, there is a lack of understanding of exactly what the outcome of someone's actions will be, at least until it's too late. That's what I mean by 'ceiling', I don't mean it directly related to weapons, I mean that kids here don't understand that if you stamp on someone's head enough they will die. And that means they will no longer be alive. They will no longer exist. You will have taken their life. Etc etc.
You could say this to a group of kids I used to work with when I worked for the Council here and they would actually laugh. They would have no comprehension of what that means. The best they would be able to do is to relate it to a film or a piece of music, but they'd still enjoy this process somehow. And if you can't comprehend what it means to take someone's life for nothing then there is 'no ceiling' on your behaviour - knife or gun or whatever.
A young girl got shot dead a couple of years ago because her father was involved in some gang feud. I think she was in her early teens. Bear in mind this is in the UK where guns are illegal. Rather than it being some form of wake-up call it just became an event that people connected to could wear as a badge of authenticity and live out all their stupid Hollywood fantasies and then carry on with what they were doing anyway.

Rick Reuben wrote:There you have it- his argument is that weak/ineffectual police ( or pop culture images of them ) encourage violence, and his argument is that the violent get hold of weapons because they do not fear the system.

That looks to me like honeyisfunny is saying that the police and the courts do not punish the use of weapons enough, and arguing that if a 'ceiling was put on their behavior' ( like punishing the carrying of weapons, I presume ), that would get to the root of the violence problem.


It's part of what I am saying Rick, but it's not all of it, especially the part about 'the violent getting hold of weapons'. It's more that the culture we live in breeds a total lack of understanding - or empathy as holmes put it - and with that comes a desire on people's part to just do as they please regardless of the consequences to themselves (which they assume to be nil in most cases) or more importantly to others.

I don't believe that punishing people for carrying weapons is a solution. I never said that and you're putting your own words into quote marks again as though they came from someone else. I explained what I meant by 'ceiling' above.
I do think popular culture is partially to blame in some way but it's more than just the image of the Police Force. It's more that the idea of being downtrodden and rising above, 'coming from the streets' or whatever, is the norm almost and it's seen as such a thing to aim for that kids are seeking out the 'crime and violence' part of things even when there is none, or at least no actual need for it.

Rimbaud III wrote:How much violent crime do we see in white-middle class Britain?



See, I think the answer to this is 'more than you think' - and by violent crime I mean pointless violent crime, random beatings etc. I come from a farming town called March, near Ely in Cambridgeshire. It's a Tory stronghold and by and large it's grossly middle class and predominantly white.
It is just as dangerous to walk around at night as Nottingham. For the reasons I mentioned above. Kids living out some fantasy and not giving a fuck who gets in the way of it, even when they're from privileged backgrounds. They don't need to commit violent crime for money but they do it anyway.