Rick Reuben wrote:

Dr. Geek wrote:So you have not gone over what is presented on the site I linked? And if you have, how do you refute the evidence that is presented within?

Man, you are thick. I have told you- until I see video that I trust of a plane approaching the Pentagon, no, I will not accept the official version of events at face value. Is it somehow difficult for your brain to compute this? I am entitled to wait as long as I want for any evidence I want.

So the eyewitnesses that are on record stating that they saw a 757 are lying? And the pieces of aircraft that were found at the Pentagon were planted there?

Rick Reuben wrote:

Dr. Geek wrote:So the eyewitnesses that are on record stating that they saw a 757 are lying? And the pieces of aircraft that were found at the Pentagon were planted there?

You're fucking dense.

CAMERAS SHOULD HAVE RECORDED THE PLANE ON ITS APPROACH, IF THERE WAS A PLANE.

I WANT TO SEE A PLANE. IN THE AIR. AND THEN DIVING IN. AND THEN STRIKING THE BUILDING. IF THERE WAS A PLANE.

Shhhhhhhh! You're gonna wake the baby.

And video footage will prove to you that a plane did hit the Pentagon despite there being overwhelming evidence of the fact?

Or are you still holding out for a missile?

Rick Reuben wrote:

Dr. Geek wrote:And video footage will prove to you that a plane did hit the Pentagon despite there being overwhelming evidence of the fact?

If you think that you still have overwhelming evidence in the absence of any video, then you have a weird definition of overwhelming.

So are you discounting the eyewitnesses that saw a 757 heading toward the Pentagon? Are you discounting the wreckage found both inside and outside the Pentagon?

Rick Reuben wrote:

Dr. Geek wrote:So are you discounting the eyewitnesses that saw a 757 heading toward the Pentagon?

Are you discounting the curious lack of video?

CAMERAS SHOULD HAVE RECORDED THE PLANE ON ITS APPROACH, IF THERE WAS A PLANE.

I WANT TO SEE A PLANE. IN THE AIR. AND THEN DIVING IN. AND THEN STRIKING THE BUILDING. IF THERE WAS A PLANE.

Again, you're discounting the eyewitness accounts of about 30 individuals that confirmed a 757 flying toward the Pentagon. If you doubt that a plane hit the Pentagon, then how do you explain that about 30 individuals, from different vantage points, recall seeing a 757 heading toward the Pentagon?

Parts of the plane were found inside and outside the Pentagon. Are you dismissing this? If so, were they planted there or were no actual parts found?

Yes, the fact that the FBI seized several tapes showing the crash is suspicious, but there is sufficient evidence, aside from what may be contained on the footage, that proves a plane did indeed hit the Pentagon.

It's not a question of whether a plane did or did not hit the Pentagon, for there is, again, more than sufficient evidence that a plane did hit the Pentagon. The question that should be asked is why the FBI seized those tapes and has yet to release them.

The seizing of tapes is peculiar and worthy of discussion and investigation. A 757 hitting the Pentagon is fact.

There was a minimal amount of wreckage left at the pentagon. Unbelievably minimal. Likewise the so called 'jet turbine' that was found was the wrong size for a 757. The wings failed to break the windows yet the whole body was incinerated. No matter what you believe really happened all of that adds up to a big fat fish. I don't buy it.

Rick Reuben wrote:

Dr. Geek wrote:Again, you're discounting the eyewitness accounts of about 30 individuals that confirmed a 757 flying toward the Pentagon.

No, I'm not. I said I'm waiting for more evidence. If you are satisfied, why are you arguing? Everything you have seen, I have seen. I'm waiting for video, you are not. End of story.

Up until this post, you had not addressed the witnesses as being reliable or not (although you have yet to address whether the 757 parts found at the Pentagon were planted there).

But if you want to hold out on accepting that a plane hit the Pentagon, then I'll let it be.

Good day, sir.

big_dave wrote:

Mark Van Deel wrote:

big_dave wrote:Big Foot is plenty real.

CMON FUCK A GUY

Did you mean to post this in the pickup lines thread?

Has CMON FUCK A GUY not come to PRF yet?

I feel like the Marty McFly of internet memes.

Everything you've heard 'bout 9/11's a lie!
AHHH.... CMON FUCK A GUY.

swemeastymn wrote:The rice bush sex head

One part Om lyric, one part conspiracy theory.

We could be on to something here.

I see naked people

WoundedFoot wrote:

big_dave wrote:

Mark Van Deel wrote:

big_dave wrote:Big Foot is plenty real.

CMON FUCK A GUY

Did you mean to post this in the pickup lines thread?

Has CMON FUCK A GUY not come to PRF yet?

I feel like the Marty McFly of internet memes.

Everything you've heard 'bout 9/11's a lie!
AHHH.... CMON FUCK A GUY.

WHEN JEWS GRADUATE FLIGHT SCHOOL THEY PUT BOMBS IN THE SKY
AAAAAAAH CMON FUCK A GUY