Page 56 of 64

The 9-11 Cover Up Ends: July 9, 2008

Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 2:28 am
by greg_Archive
I can't wait for July 9th.

The 9-11 Cover Up Ends: July 9, 2008

Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 9:24 am
by andteater_Archive
clocker bob wrote:WTC7 partially evacuated, huge explosions and damage, corpses strewn across parts of the building. All before either Twin Tower was demolished.


i watched the video.

WTC7 Partially evacuated = true

Huge Explosions and Damage = true

Corpses..."before either Twin Tower" = not true

according to the guy's story, he reached the main floor (where he is told not to "look down" as he was walking over bodies) AFTER the towers collapsed.

i find it bizzare that somebody would be so shocked to see the main floor of a building absolutely destroyed when one of the largest structures in the world, right next door, just collapsed.

july 10th, 2008 - a day after the 9/11 conspiracy was exposed

The 9-11 Cover Up Ends: July 9, 2008

Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 9:33 am
by Heeby Jeeby_Archive
Image


Thats some pretty serious damage to the bottom corner of the building.

The 9-11 Cover Up Ends: July 9, 2008

Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 11:44 am
by Heeby Jeeby_Archive
Rick Reuben wrote:
Heeby Jeeby wrote:Thats some pretty serious damage to the bottom corner of the building.
Are you pointing out that a building that had corner damage should have begun leaning towards the damage, rather than doing what it did: fall evenly straight down, mimicing a controlled demolition?

If so- great point.


I don't know. I don't have any formal training in structural engineering. I would guess that a building damaged in the bottom corner would lean or fall to that side but that's all it would be, a guess.

The 9-11 Cover Up Ends: July 9, 2008

Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 3:41 pm
by Gramsci_Archive
Popular Mechanics examines the evidence and consults the experts to refute the most persistent conspiracy theories of September 11


Popular Mechanics Report of 9-11

It's not rocket science.

The 9-11 Cover Up Ends: July 9, 2008

Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 4:37 pm
by andteater_Archive
Rick Reuben wrote:Are you aware that the official version said for five years that there were zero deaths inside WTC7, and then, I think in 2006, a single death was reported from inside WTC7?


well that would make sense, as according to the dude's testimony, when he arrived, the place was pretty empty. i would assume that the "bodies" he has to step over in what was the lobby of WTC7 were not neccesarily "in" WTC7 when they died - i would assume that those people died in the towers or outside the towers when they collapsed and were carried to the WTC7 Lobby area when you know...

this happened:

Image


and again...the guy entered WTC7 before the towers collapsed and then they collapsed while he was on the 6th/8th floor (i forget which one exactly) and the above happened...he returns to the ground floor and is "shocked" to see that its an absolute disaster area?

andyk

The 9-11 Cover Up Ends: July 9, 2008

Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 5:27 pm
by Dr Geek_Archive
What does 9/11 have to do with O.J. Simpson's birthdate?

The 9-11 Cover Up Ends: July 9, 2008

Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 5:30 pm
by big_dave_Archive
The idea that sky scrapers might ever fall sideways is hilarious to me and probably the most consistant reason for me opening threads and web-pages like this one.

Do some people live in a magical world with no sense of scale, where toy motor cars compact and explode if rolled if the edge of a table?

The 9-11 Cover Up Ends: July 9, 2008

Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 6:13 pm
by Andrew_Archive
big_dave wrote:
Do some people live in a magical world with no sense of scale, where toy motor cars compact and explode if rolled [off] the edge of a table?


Tonka 4ever.

The 9-11 Cover Up Ends: July 9, 2008

Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 7:51 pm
by scntfc_Archive
big_dave wrote:The idea that sky scrapers might ever fall sideways is hilarious


they're just like big giant trees! eyewitness accounts be damned, my number one reason for calling bullshit on all these "theories" is from the simple ignorance of basic rules of physics.

and. one of their main arguments is that all the collapses look as if they were via "controlled demolition". i for one need to know what an out-of-control, good ole fashioned anything goes, buck wild, crazy nuts bonkers, free-for-all demolition looks like before i can understand this distinction.