I'll try and stand-in for Chomsky; it's self-preservation. The willingness to look like a fool on JFK and 9/11 allows him to maintain his 'grand old man of semi-safe criticism of the shadow government' status. He doesn't want to roll the dice on a conspiracy theory that could put a major wound in the establishment. Chomsky prefers to attack the shadow government with a salad fork, not with a sword.
He's not reckless. Neither was RFK before his death, neither are the surviving Kennedys today. If you read comments from family friends of the Kennedys, they agreed to go along with the Warren Commission although they knew it was a cover-up, and RFK survived just fine until his '68 candidacy proved a new threat to the war machine.
Chomsky knows he's outgunned. Anyone who thinks he genuinely believes in Oswald the lone assassin is deluding themselves.
Regarding the Fox program on the jetliner's controls overridden by external radio command:
Read about Global Hawk technology.
Think about Hani Hanjour allegedly bringing in flight 77 across the Pentagon lawn, a maneuver that Gus Grissom might not have pulled off on first try.
Think about the other amateurish hijacker pilots finding their way back to Manhattan without cooperation from air traffic controllers- even on a cloudless day, not as simple as driving a car down a road.
Read about Egypt Air 990, the alleged 'suicide pilot' who nosedived into the Atlantic.
Read about what they really had on floor 23 of WTC7 and why it had to be wiped off the planet at 5:30 pm on 9/11.
Predictions Of The War On Terror, From 9-14-01
72clocker bob in 2006 wrote:Below are thirteen predictions made on 9/14/01 by G. Edward Griffin, author of the groundbreaking and factually accurate history of the United States Federal Reserve, The Creature From Jekyll Island, now in its 22nd printing.
1. The first prediction is that we will not be given genuine options regarding the war on terrorism. In the war on terrorism, we will be asked simply to choose sides. Either we are for freedom or for terrorism. The necessity or wisdom of US
interventionism will not be allowed as a topic for public debate.
2. Most American political leaders are now committed to world government, so the second prediction is that they will crow about how America will not tolerate terrorism, but they will not act as Americans. Instead, they will act as internationalists.
3. The third prediction is that the drive for national disarmament will be intensified. This will not lead to the elimination of weapons of mass destruction, but merely to the transfer of those weapons to UN control.
4. The fourth prediction is that, if any terrorists are captured, they will be brought before the UN World Court and tried as international criminals. This will create popular support for the Court and will go a long way toward legitimizing it as the ultimate high tribunal. The public will not realize the fateful precedent that is being established.
5. The fifth prediction is that the FBI will be criticized for failing to detect an attack as extensive and well coordinated as this. In reply, we will be told that the FBI was hampered by lack of funding, low manpower, and too little authority. Naturally, that will be followed by an increase in funding, additional manpower, and greatly expanded authority.
6. The sixth prediction is that, eventually, it will be discovered that the FBI and other intelligence agencies had prior warning and, possibly, specific knowledge of Tuesday’s attack; yet they did nothing to prevent it or to warn the victims. This will be a repeat of what happened at the bombing of the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City six years previously.
7. The seventh prediction is that much of the war on terrorism will be waged against Americans inside their own country. New laws, international treaties, and executive orders will severely restrict travel, speech, privacy, and the possession of firearms.
8. The eighth prediction is that those who speak out against these measures will be branded as right-wing extremists, anti-government kooks, or paranoid militiamen. The object will be to isolate all dissidents from the mainstream and frighten everyone else into remaining silent.
9. One of the few remaining obstacles to the New World Order is the Internet, because it allows the public to bypass the mass media and have access to unfiltered news.
10. The tenth prediction is that the war on terrorism will be dragged out over many years or decades. Like the war on drugs after which it is patterned, there will be no victory. That is because both of these wars are designed, not to be won, but to be waged.
11. The eleventh prediction is that it will take a long time to locate Osama bin Laden. A TV reporter can casually interview him at his mountain stronghold, but the US military and CIA – with legions of spies and Delta forces and high-tech orbiting satellites – they cannot find him. Why not? Because they do not want to find him.
12. The twelfth prediction is that, when the Taliban is toppled in Afghanistan, a new government will be established by the UN. Like Kosovo before it, a so-called UN “peacekeeping” military force will remain behind, and the country will not be independent. There will be talk about how it will represent the Afghan people, but it will serve the agendas of the internationalists who will create it.
13. The thirteenth prediction is that, while all this is going on, US politicians will continue waving the American flag and giving lip service to traditional American sentiments in order to placate their constituency who must never be allowed to know that they are being delivered into slavery.
All thirteen predictions ( other than #4 ) have either proved completely accurate, or are well on their way.
If you don't read Griffin's book on the Federal Reserve, you'll have a hood over your head for the rest of your life, and you will repeat ridiculous lies about how your country's political system works, generated by your obedience to ignorance and political correctness.
Predictions Of The War On Terror, From 9-14-01
73Rick Reuben wrote:Hilarious. Warmowski argues that we should focus on the Straussian neo-cons, because they have 'names and addresses and histories'- but ask Warmowski to give you the names, addresses and histories behind central banking ( which he also mentions ), and Warmowski's answer is 'Huh? Who? What? Huh? Anti-semite!'
Foamy The Internet Shut-In Also wrote:Never once have I fabricated a quote
You're as transparent as a press release, as repetitious as a punch-press and as interesting as an incontinent dog who plays chess.
Sure, there's crap on the floor, and a bunch of people want him gone...but he plays chess.
-r
Predictions Of The War On Terror, From 9-14-01
74None of this is going to affect me in any way, so I don't mind.
"Why stop now, just when I'm hating it?" - Marvin
Predictions Of The War On Terror, From 9-14-01
75Nico Adie wrote:None of this is going to affect me in any way, so I don't mind.
I'm seeing a pattern developing here...