kerble wrote:n.c. wrote: I'm also at work and I find really long posts really boring.
Betcha if we did a word count, your post would be just as long as Mr. Chimp's. It's no big deal if you have work to do, but don't act like the argument isn't valid because you don't have time for it. That's lazy.
Thank you, Faiz.
You know, I originally chose to pass over this comment , but I will say this:
Posts on this thread by me, Mr. Chimp, have not once argued for the pure meat diet, or that eating vegetables is stupid or any of that bullshit.
Here. Allow me to quote from my first post:
Mr. Chimp, he done wrote:My hope is to not have alienated anyone who chooses to eat more meat than me, or no meat at all.
Vegetarianism is only crap if you are not eating what you want.
The point of this statement was that I affirm anyone who eats what they want to.
Allow me to quote from my second post:
Mr. Chimp, again he done wrote:So, in conclusion, be a vegetarian or a vegan, or eat only squid or silt or sandstone or monkey breast and opossum head soup if you like.
Just please get your facts straight.
The point of this statement was twofold:
that I affirm anyone who eats what they want to.
And if they are going to discuss it, to discuss it with their facts straight.
There was no challenge issued to defend a choice of lifestyle, this was purely a factual-based response to a statement.
Perhaps, in the context of "omnivorism", humans are herbivores as much as they are carnivores.
But to base a whole "argument" on the thought that vegetarians don't eat meat because "humans are herbavores" - all the derogatory words in the world will not change that into an accurate statement.

