racism, moral high-ground, southern USA
Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2005 1:12 pm
P.S. Nice armitron gcbv
cursedby11 wrote:you say religion is a simple approach of solving complex problems..... How is religion a simple approach?
ginandtacos.com wrote:cursedby11 wrote:you say religion is a simple approach of solving complex problems..... How is religion a simple approach?
Easy. Take a complex issue - abortion, euthanasia, etc - with a large gray area and a lot of "what ifs" and say "THE BIBLE SAYS THIS IS WRONG, END OF DISCUSSION." Sounds pretty god-damn simple to me.
Then, realize how easy that was and start applying the same principle to just about every issue. I mean, there's no debate, is there? The Bible doesn't have gray areas on these issues - it doesn't permit some euthanasia or some gay marriage or some adultery.
When people refuse to recognize that there are gray areas to be debated with these issues, they are simplifying them. If one's attitude toward abortion is "It's wrong, period, all of it" I'd say that's a pretty phenomenal oversimplification that fails to take a lot of practical questions into account.[/i]
gcbv wrote:I can, my friend, remember several instances in various Christian Churches in my youth where I had conversations with preachers, ministers, and "elders" where I was told quite plainly that the Crusades brought the teachings of Christ to the heathens and unlearned.
laslo wrote:unarmedman wrote:A woman can make a decision before she gets pregnant. A child never gets to make the choice.
What choice is that? To have sex?
Because accidents do happen. Birth control does fail. I guess no woman should ever have sex until she is ready willing to give birth to a child. Egads.
only here wrote:laslo wrote:unarmedman wrote:A woman can make a decision before she gets pregnant. A child never gets to make the choice.
What choice is that? To have sex?
that's the choice exactly, yes.
Because accidents do happen. Birth control does fail. I guess no woman should ever have sex until she is ready willing to give birth to a child. Egads.
any woman or man who chooses to wait for the reasons you listed has made a rational decision and i have no problem seeing the value in that. i can even respect it. egads nothing.
steve wrote:If I hear from enough people that the Bible is the moral compass for man, then I am obliged to familiarize myself with it. If I hear from these same people that the Bible is their source for political and social positions, then I am obliged to take it seriously, as they do. If these moral, political and social positions have an impact on me and my friends, then I am obliged to hold them accountable for them, and the Bible, if it is a part of the argument.
I would happily ignore it (except for the good parts about loving the least of us, all of us being brothers, greed being wrong, punishment being reserved away from fickle mankind, etc.), but I am not allowed to because Christians keep throwing it up on the table for discussion. I am not afraid of them, and I am willing to look at their Bible for myself, rather than take their word for it that it means something.
If they would let us, we would stop picking on it. They won't.
chauncey wrote:Why wouldn't one want to have some kind of understanding of their maker? Read the book of Job. We are cursed, as is the ground we walk on. The OT certainly makes sense in light of this. This life is far from fair. The good don't get what they deserve, nor do the bad. The first will be last, the last will be first. That refers to the world not as it is now, but as it will be after the day of judgement. Christ was here for redemption - to redeem the world. One day it will be redeemed and the meek will inherit the earth, but not as it is now, it will be a much finer home than it is now.