well duh
Re: Rage Against the Machine
72The Pumpkins suck, though.
We're headed for social anarchy when people start pissing on bookstores.
Re: Rage Against the Machine
73i can't think of a single person who cares about this conversation in the entire world.
Re: The Smashing Pumpkins Suck
74No one cares, I suppose.hbiden@onlyfans.com wrote: Thu Feb 13, 2025 5:48 pmi can't think of a single person who cares about this conversation in the entire world.
We're headed for social anarchy when people start pissing on bookstores.
Re: Rage Against the Machine
75So, for the FM browsing, retitling this makes it appear to be a thread about the Pumpkins, sucking. If they were to click, they would find six pages on RATM. What is possibly gained by retitling it?
Now it's probably back to normal. But why? It's like click bait which goes against the archaic charms of a message board. I think this shows me more clearly why it's annoying. It's like someone interrupting a conversation to tell everyone it's now officially about a tangential topic. Chat it up. Start a new conversation. But don't tell everyone what they're talking about.
Now it's probably back to normal. But why? It's like click bait which goes against the archaic charms of a message board. I think this shows me more clearly why it's annoying. It's like someone interrupting a conversation to tell everyone it's now officially about a tangential topic. Chat it up. Start a new conversation. But don't tell everyone what they're talking about.
Re: Rage Against the Machine
76HBOF is a troll.losthighway wrote: Fri Feb 14, 2025 8:12 am So, for the FM browsing, retitling this makes it appear to be a thread about the Pumpkins, sucking. If they were to click, they would find six pages on RATM. What is possibly gained by retitling it?
Now it's probably back to normal. But why? It's like click bait which goes against the archaic charms of a message board. I think this shows me more clearly why it's annoying. It's like someone interrupting a conversation to tell everyone it's now officially about a tangential topic. Chat it up. Start a new conversation. But don't tell everyone what they're talking about.
Re: Rage Against the Machine
77I'm sorry. I did that as a joke.losthighway wrote: Fri Feb 14, 2025 8:12 am So, for the FM browsing, retitling this makes it appear to be a thread about the Pumpkins, sucking. If they were to click, they would find six pages on RATM. What is possibly gained by retitling it?
Now it's probably back to normal. But why? It's like click bait which goes against the archaic charms of a message board. I think this shows me more clearly why it's annoying. It's like someone interrupting a conversation to tell everyone it's now officially about a tangential topic. Chat it up. Start a new conversation. But don't tell everyone what they're talking about.
We're headed for social anarchy when people start pissing on bookstores.
Re: Rage Against the Machine
79Support.penningtron wrote: Fri Feb 14, 2025 8:49 am I'm this case Krev was trolling hbiden.
edit: he beat me to it
Re: Rage Against the Machine
80And here I thought it was the guy who was always doing that!Krev wrote: Fri Feb 14, 2025 8:48 amI'm sorry. I did that as a joke.losthighway wrote: Fri Feb 14, 2025 8:12 am So, for the FM browsing, retitling this makes it appear to be a thread about the Pumpkins, sucking. If they were to click, they would find six pages on RATM. What is possibly gained by retitling it?
Now it's probably back to normal. But why? It's like click bait which goes against the archaic charms of a message board. I think this shows me more clearly why it's annoying. It's like someone interrupting a conversation to tell everyone it's now officially about a tangential topic. Chat it up. Start a new conversation. But don't tell everyone what they're talking about.
We're cool everyone. Even HBOF. Except not you Billy Corgan, you fucked up.