llllllllllllllllllll wrote: Mon Mar 02, 2026 12:08 am I can’t engage with somebody that comes here to get picked on, sorry.

that's not true. the prf is less judgmental than most people think. I’m living proof that we can coexist.
but i admire your restraint.

hbiden, go back to your rest area.

Krev wrote: Mon Mar 02, 2026 1:06 am hbiden, go back to your rest area.

Meet me there in 80 minutes. Bring the wig again.

We're basically living in Epstein's world now. I was listening to a podcast that was going over what was found in the files. Things like, a conversation he was having with the head of Blizzard Entertainment, where Epstein essentially gave him the idea of microtransactions. Lots of talk about how to change the world in this exact way, to make the rulers of the world be essentially as moral and ethics free in order to make someone like Epstein himself unaccountable; to corrupt society to the very top in order to rule over everyone else with impunity.

It's becoming clear that Israel is basically the main player here, using the US at it's whim and Russia as the scapegoat. I keep saying this, but we're going to--if not already--find out a lot of events in the last couple of decades that are seemingly unrelated will be tied back to Epstein.

The scariest thing about it all is that Epstein doesn't really seem to be all that intelligent... but the funniest part is that Elon seems to be the dimmest.

If y'all sperm lucky and all that.

cakes wrote: Mon Mar 02, 2026 10:44 am We're basically living in Epstein's world now.

The scariest thing about it all is that Epstein doesn't really seem to be all that intelligent... but the funniest part is that Elon seems to be the dimmest.

There's also a New Yorker Radio Hour episode about this. Julie K Brown does not believe Epstein committed suicide in jail.

https://www.newyorker.com/news/the-new- ... trump-knew

I'm reminded of the Ballard novel Super-Cannes, and Wilder Penrose is Epstein.

Everyone making money now and in the future with whatever happens in Iran is not just superficially associated with these people.

Operation Epstein Fury is already failing miserably.

Wood Goblin wrote: Sat Feb 28, 2026 8:42 am Well done, all of you “gorsh, I just can’t vote for Harris because foreign policy is my #1 issue.” You got what you wanted. Hope you’re happy.

Nothing against Harris specifically in this case, but do you remember when Clinton bombed Iraq because WMDs...during his Impeachment trial? If you're feeling vindictive you can roll Tony Blair in there too. I won't dig in deeper, but the story is a familiar one:

Leaked audio from the Epstein files, surfacing in February 2026, featured a conversation between Jeffrey Epstein and former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak in 2013, where they discussed "gigantic" sums of money (specifically mentioning millions of dollars) allegedly paid to Blair for consultancy work after he left office.
Their initial meeting was arranged by Lord Peter Mandelson, who described Epstein to officials as a "safe" and "active scientific catalyst/entrepreneur".

Yeah. I'm happy I didn't vote (though my state of residence reliably and conveniently precludes my culpability in such matters).

Or to think about it in other terms, maybe if Harris wouldn’t have been such a foreign policy dumbass she would have won.

Hamid Bendaas, a spokesperson for the IMEU Policy Project, said that during the meeting "the DNC shared with us that their own data also found that policy was, in their words, a 'net-negative' in the 2024 election." Two other senior aides at the pro-Palestinian organization also said the DNC had drawn that conclusion.
Axios independently verified that Democratic officials conducting the autopsy believed the issue harmed the party's standing with some voters.

But go ahead and blow off steam by making digs at the 20 people reading this rather than… Kamala Harris. It’s the voters that have to be tactical, you see, not the person running to be President of the United States of America. She can just say whatever the fuck, it’s fine.

I hear all the criticism of Kamala Harris, and don't think she was anyone's ideal candidate. But she was debating a seething moron in the throes of dementia vomiting fallacies about Haitians eating household pets. I fail to see how anyone of sound mind could watch that and say "ooh, motherfucker, there's a real president."