Bands that would have been-would be better w- no singing

81
Champion Rabbit wrote:
LAD wrote:I agree with each band in this thread (excepting shagboy's little joke). And what I'm about to say will probably offend you, but I'll add, the Jesus Lizard.

Yow trivialized their music with his hokey clown act. He blustered his way through every song with the same meaningless schtick and as a consequence all their songs 'feel' vey similar.

It's not that he couldn't sing. 'All my favorite singers can't sing.' It's that every song sets the same mood because of him. And it's not a mood that runs very deep. It's superficial and already sounds dated. This band hasn't aged well for me because of the vocals.

I would listen to this band much more, and take much more from the music if it weren't for the groggy-voiced 'crazy guy' shrieking about nothing all the time.



That's a very, very good point.


Ever listen to Elegy?

You expect Jesus Lizard songs to be sung as if they are meaningful? Have you ever payed attention to the lyrics?

Just a band having fun. Don't make it anything more than that.

Bands that would have been-would be better w- no singing

82
syntaxfree07 wrote:Just a band having fun. Don't make it anything more than that.


while i'd hesitate to call the jesus lizard's lyrics meaningless, assuming that's the implication, i think i know what you're getting at. and i agree that one bands' reckless abandon -- simply bashing out a helluva good racket -- can be just as compelling as another band's discernably "meaningful" songwriting.

Bands that would have been-would be better w- no singing

84
Andrew L. wrote:I agree with each band in this thread (excepting shagboy's little joke). And what I'm about to say will probably offend you, but I'll add, the Jesus Lizard.

Yow trivialized their music with his hokey clown act. He blustered his way through every song with the same meaningless schtick and as a consequence all their songs 'feel' vey similar.

It's not that he couldn't sing. 'All my favorite singers can't sing.' It's that every song sets the same mood because of him. And it's not a mood that runs very deep. It's superficial and already sounds dated. This band hasn't aged well for me because of the vocals.

I would listen to this band much more, and take much more from the music if it weren't for the groggy-voiced 'crazy guy' shrieking about nothing all the time.


I don't think I would have gone to see them more than once without DY.

And I like his "singing"; his rhythmic sense is superb, and his tone is, uh, unique. Plus, how could they play "Tight N Shiny" without him?

Bands that would have been-would be better w- no singing

86
MajorEverettMiller wrote:Built

to

Spill

I really, really like a lot of the songs, but Doug Martsch's vocals annoy the ever-living shit out of me.


I can see where you're coming from...

except

his lyrics and vocal melodies are excellent! it's just the way he sings them...

but I'll still rather endure his style as tradeoff for the lyrics and the melodies. It would be nice if no one imitated it, though.

Along similar lines, I think certain Flaming Lips songs would be much better without vocals.

System of a Down might not be so punch-myself-in-the-nuts awful to my ears without vocals.

Trail of Dead could probably do without a lot of those vocals as well.
George

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests