Chicago smoking ban
Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2005 10:57 am
steve
i know the other dude can answer your comments himself but i don't understand how you can approve of smoking in public places
"This applies to a lot of things. Why is this your target? Ignore for a moment that the only second-hand smoke study that I know of has no results outside its margin of error (eg we don't have reason yet to believe that it causes any health risks), and explain why this is your target. Not automobile exhaust, not open fire grilling, not dust, not aromatic solvents. Is it because you don't like the smell of smoke? "
-- dude if i frequented bars and restaurants where people revved their engines or sprayed copious amounts of febreeze or did anything that would potentially fuck up my health i would be complaining about that too. and i'm sure there's a few cases on this planet where some people are complaining about badly ventilated parking garages or something. however smoking is the biggest problem and the most relevent, which is why it's the target of many people.
"Then don't go places where you will be offended by the conduct underway there. Don't go to bars that are too smokey for you. The conduct was underway happily for long before you made it your concern, and you are not entitled to change it to suit you."
--great thinking. maybe i should also stay out of the alleys because of the crime, instead of trying to make them safer.
"So, you agree with me then. Smoking in bars is normal, not crazy, and everyone is used to it. There are places where there is no smoke, and if it is a big deal, then you can just go to those places. "
-n-onsmokers in bars is also normal, not crazy. they have been around just as long as the smokers. however since we are now learning so much about the health risks it's turning into a different ballgame. disrupting shit because it use to be 'normal' is a weak argument.
"I didn't say it wasn't selfish, only that it is the established norm. If you want to disrupt centuries of leisure for everyone to suit your conception of what ought to be allowed, then please find a compelling argument first. I might even listen. So far the public health argument is wanting. "
--first i don't see how the public health argument is wanting. i know penn and teller told you it's okay or whatever but i'm pretty sure there are a lot of medical studies showing second hand smoke is really bad for you. secondly, again just because it use to be the norm doesn't make it awesome now. for centuries people use to watch other people fight lions for entertainment but eventually more and more people spoke out against it.
"If I saw a bar where everyone was doing something I didn't want to do or be around -- kickboxing or curare darts or HIV infection night -- then I wouldn't go to that bar. I wouldn't make them stop so I could. "
--but the point is you COULD go to that bar if you wanted to and provided people kept to themselves you wouldn't be compromising your health or security or anything. the whole 'don't go to the bar if you don't like smoke' argument reminds me of stupid hardcore kids telling people not to go to a hardcore show if you don't want to get punched or kicked.
"I think the health issue is secondary to the "my clothes smell" issue, and the health angle is used as cover. There is a strong case to be made for not drinking in a bar all night, if health is one's primary concern."
-your health vs the health of everyone in the room are two very different things, if you are a factor.
i know the other dude can answer your comments himself but i don't understand how you can approve of smoking in public places
"This applies to a lot of things. Why is this your target? Ignore for a moment that the only second-hand smoke study that I know of has no results outside its margin of error (eg we don't have reason yet to believe that it causes any health risks), and explain why this is your target. Not automobile exhaust, not open fire grilling, not dust, not aromatic solvents. Is it because you don't like the smell of smoke? "
-- dude if i frequented bars and restaurants where people revved their engines or sprayed copious amounts of febreeze or did anything that would potentially fuck up my health i would be complaining about that too. and i'm sure there's a few cases on this planet where some people are complaining about badly ventilated parking garages or something. however smoking is the biggest problem and the most relevent, which is why it's the target of many people.
"Then don't go places where you will be offended by the conduct underway there. Don't go to bars that are too smokey for you. The conduct was underway happily for long before you made it your concern, and you are not entitled to change it to suit you."
--great thinking. maybe i should also stay out of the alleys because of the crime, instead of trying to make them safer.
"So, you agree with me then. Smoking in bars is normal, not crazy, and everyone is used to it. There are places where there is no smoke, and if it is a big deal, then you can just go to those places. "
-n-onsmokers in bars is also normal, not crazy. they have been around just as long as the smokers. however since we are now learning so much about the health risks it's turning into a different ballgame. disrupting shit because it use to be 'normal' is a weak argument.
"I didn't say it wasn't selfish, only that it is the established norm. If you want to disrupt centuries of leisure for everyone to suit your conception of what ought to be allowed, then please find a compelling argument first. I might even listen. So far the public health argument is wanting. "
--first i don't see how the public health argument is wanting. i know penn and teller told you it's okay or whatever but i'm pretty sure there are a lot of medical studies showing second hand smoke is really bad for you. secondly, again just because it use to be the norm doesn't make it awesome now. for centuries people use to watch other people fight lions for entertainment but eventually more and more people spoke out against it.
"If I saw a bar where everyone was doing something I didn't want to do or be around -- kickboxing or curare darts or HIV infection night -- then I wouldn't go to that bar. I wouldn't make them stop so I could. "
--but the point is you COULD go to that bar if you wanted to and provided people kept to themselves you wouldn't be compromising your health or security or anything. the whole 'don't go to the bar if you don't like smoke' argument reminds me of stupid hardcore kids telling people not to go to a hardcore show if you don't want to get punched or kicked.
"I think the health issue is secondary to the "my clothes smell" issue, and the health angle is used as cover. There is a strong case to be made for not drinking in a bar all night, if health is one's primary concern."
-your health vs the health of everyone in the room are two very different things, if you are a factor.