Premier Rock Forum

someone said to me the other day that the buttons on her shirt were 'superfluous to requirements'. i said nothing..i mean, she was in the right ballpark...

I just remembered, a keep a copy here at work of a letter which accompanied a planning application. It informed me that

The keeping of pigs in dark, low buildings is fround a pone.

matthew, the work retard, said last week that he wasn't going jogging if 'there was the same level of consistancy to the rain'

the same day he also spent 15 minutes walking around the car park for no discernable reason...

fantasmatical thorr wrote:someone said to me the other day that the buttons on her shirt were 'superfluous to requirements'. i said nothing..i mean, she was in the right ballpark...

I don't get it, what should she have said?

SURPLUS

fantasmatical thorr wrote:SURPLUS

su·per·flu·ous P Pronunciation Key (s-pûrfl-s)
adj.
Being beyond what is required or sufficient.

sur·plus P Pronunciation Key (sûrpls, -pls)
adj.
Being more than or in excess of what is needed or required: surplus grain

Just call me Super-Pedant!

[winky face]

Adam CR wrote:

fantasmatical thorr wrote:SURPLUS

su·per·flu·ous P Pronunciation Key (s-pûrfl-s)
adj.
Being beyond what is required or sufficient.

sur·plus P Pronunciation Key (sûrpls, -pls)
adj.
Being more than or in excess of what is needed or required: surplus grain

Just call me Super-Pedant!

[winky face]

yeah but you wouldn't say "superfluous to requirement" you would say "surplus to requirement" geddit?

I think you COULD say superfluous, but it would be more usual to say surplus. Hence its not a malaprop, just a slightly odd way of speaking.

well, i think it's stupid. and it would be nice if you could back me up once in a while!


oops. i forgot myself then.

daniel robert chapman wrote:I just remembered, a keep a copy here at work of a letter which accompanied a planning application. It informed me that

The keeping of pigs in dark, low buildings is fround a pone.

OUTSTANDING!