Angry_Dragon wrote:Any band with an Eddie Vedder knock-off for a singer.
any band fitting that description would also be better to do without the music.
Angry_Dragon wrote:Any band with an Eddie Vedder knock-off for a singer.
To me Steve wrote:I'm curious why[...] you wouldn't just fuck off instead. Let's hear your record, cocksocket.
To me Steve wrote:I'm curious why[...] you wouldn't just fuck off instead. Let's hear your record, cocksocket.
Rotten Tanx wrote:I agree 100% with radiohead. With no vocals I might even listen to an entire song.
Tool & APC
ticdouloureaux wrote:Skinny Puppy
YO31 wrote:Jesus Lizard
tommydski wrote:teenage jesus and the jerks.
Adam CR wrote:Killdozer.
tallchris wrote:90% of metal would be far better without vocals.
Andrew L. wrote:
Yow trivialized their music with his hokey clown act. He blustered his way through every song with the same meaningless schtick and as a consequence all their songs 'feel' vey similar.
It's not that he couldn't sing. 'All my favorite singers can't sing.' It's that every song sets the same mood because of him. And it's not a mood that runs very deep. It's superficial and already sounds dated. This band hasn't aged well for me because of the vocals.
I would listen to this band much more, and take much more from the music if it weren't for the groggy-voiced 'crazy guy' shrieking about nothing all the time.
occupant wrote:I vote for Janes Addiction. I would still hate them, but not nearly as much.
Return to “General Discussion”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests