slim
my favorite baseball book bar none is _the physics of baseball_ by robt. adair
i've read it cover to cover every year, pretty much, since i bought it maybe five or six years ago
it will enhance your viewing experience and knowledge of the game
many baseball books are quite dewy-eyed, but i am someone who has been known to curse at the top of his lungs as a result of onfield developments both favorable and displeasing, and i have shed tears at elements of the game a few times, most recently the 'baseball in america' exhibit at the museum of science and industry (letter to hank aaron from a fan--racial injustice will always get a white liberal where it counts). to that end, i can recommend:
_the boys of summer_, roger kahn
_summer of '49_, david halberstam
_men at work_, george will (purportedly a more-or-less scholarly tome, but really just more musings about the game's 'poetry' and the 'genius' of the people involved in it)
_moneyball_, the new book about billy beane and the oakland a's, is quite good. essential reading for the modern baseball fan.
_the bill james historical abstract_ is entertaining. james is full of himself and other things at times, but a) he knows it, and b) he can write, which are his main saving graces. and he has insight about many things having to do with the game and its intricacies. for such a huge book, with hundreds of player rankings in it, it still has the feel of a trifle at times, but i like picking it up.
_win shares_, on the other hand, details james' revolutionary system for rating players' contributions to their teams. i have to say it is an extremely valuable tool. some of the formulations get a little half-assed in their minute details, but most of the time they are this way out of necessity: ltd. statistical information, vagaries of time and place and topography inherent in the game. the defensive evaluation of the catcher is particularly loophole-ridden, but even this is a dramatic improvement on anything done beforehand.
the real litmus test is how often a 'win shares' rating measures up with what one's impressions are, as taken from exposure to a player's performance. and the win shares just have the ring of truth, pretty much all the time. they provide a concrete way to describe barry bonds the last couple years (best ever one-season totals of, like, 52 and 49 win shares, or something like that). it's a meticulously detailed, well-balanced system. foolproof, probably not, but the best one yet without a doubt.
i wouldn't recommend starting your reading with _win shares_, however. _moneyball_ and _the physics of baseball_, perhaps.
here's a list from dudes who would know--_the hidden game of baseball_ is supposed to be good:
http://baseballguru.com/b_sabr.html