MajorEverettMiller wrote:[i]t would be pretty fucking awesome if George Mason were national champs because...seriously...where the fuck did they come from?
I do not like the fact that George Mason has progressed this far in the tournament.
They are middling team from a middling conference that barely snuck into the tournament. Since then, they have beaten a few other teams that were in down years (UNC, Michigan State) or played really crappy basketball throughout the tournament (UConn). You could reasonably argue that Wichita State was, at the time of the tournament, the best of the four teams that George Mason played, which tells you everything that you need to know.
And it was really a joke that George Mason got a regional final game that amounted to a home game versus UConn. Great work with the "pods", NCAA.
George Mason, so mediocre team to "get hot" and win four games. Who cares? You are still clearly mediocre team that I do not like to watch. Maybe you are not so bad as the UCLA-Memphis game, which is maybe the worst college basketball game that I have ever seen, but George Mason, why must I watch you? So I will not watch you.
When it comes to the Final Four, I want a slugfest. I want to see the best teams beat up one another. I don't want a "Hoosiers" story. Gimme some horses, man.
George Mason!
People will apparently cheer for your mediocre team simply because they hadn't heard of your school before!
People like to say things like "that's why they play the games"!
So very lame.
I'll either be rooting for LSU, Florida, UCLA or the 1990 UNLV Runnin' Rebels.
Lose, George Mason, lose.