Are you a Crapper or a Non Crapper? I mean, generally speaking? Errr let me explain:
I find that in this little game of C/NC I am a man who gives the subject in question the benefit of his doubt. If a band has a couple of songs I like here and there amongst hours I really am not a fan of; a writer wrote one good book between reams of shit; a comedian was funny once some time in the past or a philosopher at least had the balls to write a polemic text - in these cases I vote Not Crap.
However, I imagine there are The Unforgiving amongst us - those who take no pity and make that band suffer for those truly bullshit three albums that followed the good one; cannot forgive the gaseous claptrap that followed such-and-such an author's decent romp; won't laugh with the once-funny man nor give the time of day to that mug what entertained the notion of Historical Materialism.
I do not wish to put it to thee that The Non Crapper is superior in his judgement to the Crapper, nor vice versa - I just wanted to know how things work around here. Are you a generous soul or a harsh yet fair critic? Should one excuse those atrocious 80s albums? Should one call bullshit on the artist who hasn't knocked something decent together in 20 years? Are you a CRAPPER of a NON-CRAPPER?
Are you a Crapper or a Non Crapper?
1Rick Reuben wrote:He went to bed about a decade ago, or whenever he sold his soul to the bankers and the elites.daniel robert chapman wrote:I think he's gone to bed, Rick.

