Is it absurd that we re still using vacuum tubes in amps?
Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2007 4:43 am
Does anybody else find it kind of silly and absurd that we're still using tube amplifiers even though solid state transistors have become massively more convenient for nearly every other type of electrical technology?
Don't get me wrong! I'm not saying I don't understand why people use them. I own two tube amps of my own and can probably better describe the warmth of tube sound better than the warmth of a vagina.
Why hasn't there been technology that has been able to successfully replicate the low-end and the gradations in the clipping that makes everybody bonkers for tubes? At my university, there were some students in electrical engineering that had designed a solid state amp that was designed to replicate tube sounds, and they had it do so by having something dictate when the amp should clip as the volume increased in order to compensate for the harsh, dichotomous clipping of a solid state amplifier. They claimed that the drive was pretty close to a tube amp, but they weren't able to get the "warmth", which they said was characterized by a boosted second harmonic.
It really seems like with enough time, somebody should be able to figure this out. Personally, it seems ridiculous to me that so many of us are lugging around these extremely expensive, volatile, and difficult pieces of equipment.
Hmm... volatile, expensive, and difficult... What does that remind you of?
By the way, I really like the word "bonkers" and am trying to use it as much as possible.
Don't get me wrong! I'm not saying I don't understand why people use them. I own two tube amps of my own and can probably better describe the warmth of tube sound better than the warmth of a vagina.
Why hasn't there been technology that has been able to successfully replicate the low-end and the gradations in the clipping that makes everybody bonkers for tubes? At my university, there were some students in electrical engineering that had designed a solid state amp that was designed to replicate tube sounds, and they had it do so by having something dictate when the amp should clip as the volume increased in order to compensate for the harsh, dichotomous clipping of a solid state amplifier. They claimed that the drive was pretty close to a tube amp, but they weren't able to get the "warmth", which they said was characterized by a boosted second harmonic.
It really seems like with enough time, somebody should be able to figure this out. Personally, it seems ridiculous to me that so many of us are lugging around these extremely expensive, volatile, and difficult pieces of equipment.
Hmm... volatile, expensive, and difficult... What does that remind you of?
By the way, I really like the word "bonkers" and am trying to use it as much as possible.