Is this measure really warranted?

Yes, this is an effective way to curb the problem of underage drinking, you immature whippersnappers.
Total votes: 1 (14%)
No, this will most likely make the problem worse.
Total votes: 6 (86%)
Total votes: 7

So my university is trying to curb underage drinking...

1
By trying to get the city to pass a ridiculous anti-party ordinance.

Basically, what they're proposing is that anyone held responsible for throwing a party where underage people are drinking would be fined $1000 per underage drinker and be subject to a six-month jail term (maximum penalties assumed). That's not including the civil charges- plus, "hosts could also be required to reimburse the county for the expense of sending sheriff's officers to the scene."

There are a whole shitload of problems with this ordinance that my friends have just discussed at length back at school, but what are your thoughts on this? Are there any organizations that can help us fight this?

So my university is trying to curb underage drinking...

10
Mark Lansing wrote:I thought the whole point of going to college was to drink yourself into a stupor for four years. Things have sure changed since I graduated, I suppose.


I had a rule in college that I would never drink 2 days in a row or 2 weekends in a row, everyone thought I was nuts.

for a few of the years I cut out all drinking and all sugar deserts. Man I was a cranky fuck that year, but I got great GPA

Sr year i had already cleared most of my hard Bio classes so I spent most of the time chasing (and catching) pussy and playing guitar. It was actually my bands best year as far as songs we put together and some super small "shows" we played.

I never really saw anyone do anything great while drinking heavily in school, mostly chicks would end up naked in a ditch some where and guys would end up w/ lost teeth from a fight w/ 10 frat boys w/ baseball bats

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests