http://www.howmanyfiveyearoldscouldyoutakeinafight.com

I can take 20.

I think that's low. If you can't take more than 20 you're a gay or a Belgian.

20. that seems about right.

25

25 five year olds would feel the cold heel of my boot.

seems about right. hell, I kicked the shit out of three five year olds just yesterday while smoking a cigarette and drinking a fifth of jack.

I got 31. I would pick up a kid and use it to hit other kids.

trompuss wrote:I got 31. I would pick up a kid and use it to hit other kids.

I got a 19, and I would do the same.

I bet it is because I am short.

20. I guess that means I'm a wimp.

I have a six and a four year old, so I know what I'm talking about. I understand how they think. Major advantage right there.

I could take alot. Physically, they can't do to much to you as far as major injury. Mentally, they're even worse. I mean, kick one in the balls, hard, and you've got a major psycological advantage. I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say at least forty. Let's face it...five-year olds are complete pussies. If you can throw and connect with fifty plus meaningful punches and/or kicks for five to six minutes, you got yourself forty fucked-up ass five year olds.

Couple that with my unquenchable thirst for winning, and you've got yourself forty. Easy.

Fragile Adam's apples and faces, weak legs...I'm starting to think fifty.

Edit: 36..."You could take on 36 five year old kids in a fight."

This survey does represent the psycological edge (which I happen to think is huge) well enough.

23. Bring 'em on....

33 chillins.