Gibson SG.

Crap!
Total votes: 8 (13%)
Not Crap!
Total votes: 52 (87%)
Total votes: 60

Instrument: Gibson SG.

5
CRAP simply due to the cost of these things. I used to have a beautiful Guild SG that put every Gibson Sg I've ever owned or played to shame. Then my dumbass left it in my trunk on a day when it was 100 degrees out and now it has the action of a harp.

Yes, I am an idiot for doing this.
Better yet, eat the placenta!!!

Instrument: Gibson SG.

6
I have been a bit disappointed with the clean tones I've heard out of them, but that could just be because I haven't had time to really mess around with one
.

Find an SG Special or Junior w/ P 90 pickups. Turn down the guitar volume = Briiing...CLEAN

Turn up the Guit volume = GRRRRR...Barkin' Dirty.

Especially w/ a tube amp. Extra especially w/ a tube amp loaded w/ 6550 's.

Good example = The Who Live At Leeds

Instrument: Gibson SG.

7
I confess. I'm an SG man. 74 SG Standard Limited Edition I and an 85 SG Standard Reissue II are my two babies...

I've never had a problem with the headstocks on mine (although I treat them pretty nice) and I didn't spend an arm and a leg on them either. New SGs are ridiculously overpriced though, this is true. Also, you gotta find the right SGs, some of them don't play that great. The gems of the line are quite sparkly though :D

No waffle necessary -- these are my favorite guitars. NOT CRAP!

http://www.everythingsg.com

Instrument: Gibson SG.

10
i sincerely don´t get why those guitars have a resonant not crap when they are in my ignorant opinion really similar to les pauls. wtf?
okay, the look cooler perhaps and are more lightweight.
not crap anyways because it´s obviously a good guitar. but i´m tired of them, 4 of each 5 bands here have guitarists with black sgs.
so yeah, i'm a pussy.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests