9
by SchnappM_Archive
I suppose, since I am not actually in a band, that my opinion wouldn't mean as much as someone who was in one. But if I WERE in a band and I saw someone selling bootlegs of one of my shows for their own personal profit, I'd get pissed- after all, they didn't make the music they were selling, they're making money off of my sweat. However, most tape traders don't operate off of profit, they operate off of even trades out of a love of the music. If I broke into Electrical and stole a bunch of Shellac demo tapes or what have you, and then started trading them, even if it was not for a profit, Shellac has every right to get pissed- they never meant for the contents of the tapes to see the light of day. But if I were to go into a club and tape a Shellac show, what I'm recording is supposed to be for public consumption anyway. The only exception for this would be if they played a friends only show or something to that extent, where tickets were not publicly available. If the band would have a problem with taping the show because they don't think that the material is up to snuff with their recorded material and wouldn't want it to smudge their reputation, they probably shouldn't be playing said material live.
Then, on the other hand, some bands feel that selling live albums is a ripoff and don't do it (or only release it in Japan, etc.). So then, if live material is UNOFFICIALLY released, I would think that it would be a good way to spread the word about your band at zero cost to the band without infringing on record sales. I mean, that's how the Grateful Dead got most of their following.
With all that said, I still respect that some artists wouldn't want to have their shows taped. I have never taped a show myself, but then again, that's more out of a lack of means and not wanting to get caught than having a problem with doing taping in the first place.