Page 1 of 1

Less-than-kinetic documentarian: Ken Burns.

Posted: Wed May 19, 2021 6:33 am
by A_Man_Who_Tries
I know a lot of people who are so put off by his style that they can't get into his work, even when they are into the subject matter. I think there's something so relaxing about the beat he works at. Tantric documentary, if you like.

NC from me.

Re: Less-than-kinetic documentarian: Ken Burns.

Posted: Thu May 20, 2021 4:54 pm
by tallchris
Loved the Vietnam War and Country Music docs.

Definitely saw the Civil War and Baseball docs in school but haven't been able to get into them much as an adult tbh.

Props for sticking with this haircut for his entire adult life as a tribute to his late mother:
Image

Re: Less-than-kinetic documentarian: Ken Burns.

Posted: Sat May 22, 2021 9:31 am
by penningtron
I appreciated the Jazz series when I was a teenager, but even then knew it was very surface level. But still, for content anyone should be able to access for free it's not crap.

Re: Less-than-kinetic documentarian: Ken Burns.

Posted: Mon May 24, 2021 12:50 pm
by joelb
Mr. Burns ( i love typing that ) can be soothing. Fast forward a decade and the story changes somewhat:

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/ar ... es/618395/

Like, not everything has to be about everything. But making a doc on the national parks - in 2009 - without dedicating an entire segment to native use of the land and subsequent violent removal is like making the Civil War doc without mentioning slavery.

I would like to go back and watch the Civil War again to see what is missing, but I know that's not likely to happen.

Re: Less-than-kinetic documentarian: Ken Burns.

Posted: Tue May 25, 2021 5:14 am
by sparky
NC with waffles. "Jazz" is too narrow, cosy, denigrating the weird. Jazz to be enjoyed from the armchair, but still enjoyable. "Vietnam" moved and mesmerised me. I haven't seen anything else, but this LRB article offers convincing criticism.
Alex Abramovich wrote:And Burns isn’t much of a filmmaker, either. All those static shots and slow pans over still images; the soothing pace of his films and their lulling, hypnotic effect make the viewer feel safe, smart and well cushioned whenever sore subjects are raised. Time and again, the sore subject is race, which Burns sees (again, to his credit) as central to the American story. But where a documentary filmmaker like Frederick Wiseman, who has his own long-standing relationship with PBS, questions things as they are at every turn, Burns makes films that are composed, entirely, of flat declarative statements. (Not once, in the course of Country Music, or any other Burns film I can think of, does the narrator pause to ask a question.) It’s not that his documentaries are as conservative formally as they end up being politically. It’s that, inadvertently, the two end up being one and the same. If you’re looking to question the status quo – which is to say, white supremacy – don’t.
The whole piece is thoughtful and worth a read.