Re: Korg Nutube discussion.

3
I've been curious why there hasn't been more builds with these too. I'll bet Korg has some sort of licensing or other considerations that make it a non-starter. The FAQ doesn't enlighten a whole lot either as most answers say to fill out an inquiry & to even DL the datasheet you have to fill out a form which is kinda bunk. Asking specifically for a "business email" also leads me to think that they only want to work with people who at least have hung out a shingle.

Really this does sound like something the good Dr Balls might have an interest in - the form factor seems like it'd be perfect for pedals especially.

But honestly my opinion is that there was ever little need to replace the 12AX7 - they're small, they don't use a ton of juice and there's millions of them floating around. The real coup I think would be a power tube replacement and I doubt there's any plans to adopt nutube tech for that kind of app. I personally think the power amp section is where I notice the real benefit w/ tubes (full disclosure, I have not double-blind tested this and have actually failed this test once mistaking a Quilter for a tube head).

Re: Korg Nutube discussion.

5
Nico Adie wrote: Fri Apr 01, 2022 3:10 pm I have one of those little Vox MV50 guys, the “Boutique” one because that’s the sort of prick I am (and it was on sale for £90). It sounds great to me, and has a Nutube in it, although I don’t know what function it performs in the circuit. It really does sound great though. That’s all I’ve got…

edit - Oh and there’s this too:

https://diyaudiostore.com/products/korg-nutube
I have the exact same flavour of MV50, and concur. It sounds very good. It's currently standing in for my stricken AC15, and it's performing admirably.
"What am I gonna do with 40 subscriptions to Vibe?"

I talk disjointed music-related guff over here. You're welcome.

Re: Korg Nutube discussion.

8
bishopdante wrote: Wed Apr 06, 2022 10:59 am I couldn't agree more, but my point is that small-scale high-automation vacuum devices are current production, particularly in a laboratory setting.

Rapid manufacturing means that the concerns about mass production and cartel effects on technology use can be a thing of the past - tube was unsuitable as a consumer technology. Big, expensive, and with terrible thermal efficiency. A vacuum tube telephone system was a hassle to run.

Despite the mass produced modules of the past dwindling in supply, there are lots of engineering companies which can produce really interesting vacuum devices, particularly in the field of precision imaging. A modern vacuum package will have all manner of onboard electronics - a tube can easily have a small computer inside it, or any number of semiconductor components inside the glass these days.

The development potential for high quality audio vacuum technology for audio has been almost completely neglected, in my opinion. We haven't seen much innovation since the 1950s, so a vacuum device built using today's processes could and should be on a different level of engineering and precision. Particularly in terms of metal working, the ability to vapour deposit a printed assembly onto glass is what powers the NuTube - the grid element is printed.

However, when you start looking at the cost, weight, size and general nightmare of vacuum electronics, you can see why its use is mainly in the high energy and experimental physics domain.

This is why korg have been very clever to partner with a japanese mass-manufacturer of vacuum packages which are a 2D "biscuit production line" method, where high volume manufacturing is built into the design.

I am looking at the other angle, which is very small production, and basically the entire device being inside a very rugged series of vacuum enclosures, similar to how the military aircraft industry used to design their electronics modules in the 1950s. The whole assembly can be designed using multiphysics, and all of the electromagnetic, mechanical and acoustic qualities properly factored into the design.

You can totally hand- make your own tubes with glass blowing gear and a vacuum pump, and there are a few people who do. The glass package is of very little influence, and could feasibly be a chunk of aluminium tube with some caps screwed onto the ends like a pipe bomb. Anything that'll hold a vacuum would do, really. Reclaimed jam jars would be viable.

The people who make ships in a bottle would definitely be capable of making tubes.
You make a lot of statements that are pure speculations based on an evidentially minimal understanding of vacuum electronics. And throwing around useless terminology like “multiphyscs” without any explanation of what the hell you mean is frustrating.

Also, the assertion that an aluminum pipe with with caps screwed or a jam jar can be used as a simple vacuum chamber is laughable if not purely ridiculous.

The Nutubes are kind of nifty. I do not like that they add a phosphor to the plate to make it glow though. Seems silly just to make it light up.

I apologize for not really contributing to this conversation but as someone who spent years designing and building electron emitting vacuum devices I could not allow such foolishness to stand.


Jon
Mungion

Re: Korg Nutube discussion.

9
BD, there's a lot of parallel discussion here on this page about tube production over in the Russian tubes thread. I highly recommend checking out the whole thing as some folks here with some direct experience in MFG have weighed in on the subject of how tubes could be created now-a-days with much more advanced production techniques.

Re: Korg Nutube discussion.

10
bishopdante wrote: Tue May 03, 2022 4:51 am The fact is that you can now put pcbs and IC packages inside the glass assembly, so electronics is a lot further along in terms of possibilities. You could probably put nutibes inside a vacuum chamber on some wire spring suspension to soundproof them and stop them being microphonic.
I do not believe this is practical or even true but I concede I may be wrong. Can you please share a source that demonstrates a PCB or IC mounted inside a sealed glass vacuum tube assembly. There are a number of outgassing and electrical interference issues that would arise not to mention the fact that vacuum tubes are produced specifically with leads that exit the vacuum in order to make electrical control far easier. Seems kind of stupid to stick shit inside a vacuum when you don’t need to.

And why would you need to put the Nutubes in a Vacuum in order to isolate them from external vibrations? There are far more cost effective ways to isolate them form external sound if that is in fact the reason why they are microphonic. You could also have all of the nutubes in space and just run leads down to earth. That could work too right?

Jon
Mungion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest