CBGB Dome: Horses vs. Marquee Moon
1IMO these are the two greatest masterpieces from the NYC underground 70s punk era. Which do you choose? I'm going with Horses, but it's a tough choice for me.
In terms of the guitars, I agree but I think the rhythm-section and-duh!-vocals puts it firnly in the "New wave"/(proto) punk categoryM.H wrote: Sat Nov 25, 2023 7:30 am
Dunno if the punk label has ever been helpful for them, now I hear it as a sophisticated, urbane art school take on the psych-hippy country(ish) sound (The Dead, Country Joe & the Fish, Quicksilver Messenger Service) with all the acid wrung out. Just no audience for it in 77.
Yeah, I hear you.jakethesnake wrote: Sat Nov 25, 2023 7:38 amIn terms of the guitars, I agree but I think the rhythm-section and-duh!-vocals puts it firnly in the "New wave"/(proto) punk categoryM.H wrote: Sat Nov 25, 2023 7:30 am
Dunno if the punk label has ever been helpful for them, now I hear it as a sophisticated, urbane art school take on the psych-hippy country(ish) sound (The Dead, Country Joe & the Fish, Quicksilver Messenger Service) with all the acid wrung out. Just no audience for it in 77.
ADVENTURE is good but with 1-2 exceptions, it feels more like a collection of "strong b-sides" than the heavy hitters you hear on side 1 of Marquee Moon. I'm too young to have been there but I can understand why people found it disappointing, at least initially because its charms are more subtle. I think it's more of a "grower" and those albums always suffer in comparison...InMySoul77 wrote: Sat Nov 25, 2023 8:07 am I will agree that side two of Marquee Moon doesn't hit *quite* as hard as side one does. But I still love it. It's calmer, more polite, more pastoral
Also, Adventure has to be one of the most criminally underrated albums ever. I like it only slightly less than MM.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests