I've seen one out of a hundred Dilbert strips that were actually funny, and about only three ever have made me laugh out loud. That's a pretty Crap quotient. The TV series sucked too.

I work in cubicle-land, and I'm sick of colleagues reading it and saying, "Hey, today's strip really reminds me of Rick in Finance...". That's because the strip was about a guy in Finance. They have nothing else in common, you turd.

This is me reading Dilbert:

I've found that some are better than others.

The Leisuretown episode that borrowed all the Dilbert strips (and was subsequently forced to take all of them down, resulting in a slightly-less-funnier comic overall) was the only time Dilbert has ever really shone. It provided the strip above.

Scott Adams, a well-meaning guy. But his comic, so crap. Even for those of us "in the business" or whatever. Dilbert is "Cathy" for IT workers.

...

not crap. Cliche it might be, but there's an awful amount of awful truths in Dilbert. Or at least there were when it was funny.

Oddly enough, today's one isn't that bad either!

crap.

nowhere near as ill as the previous comic strip mentioned about the boy and his tiger.

thebookofkevin wrote:crap.

nowhere near as ill as the previous comic strip mentioned about the boy and his tiger.

I think you mean "a boy and his dog"- aka, Marmaduke.

ElRon wrote:

thebookofkevin wrote:crap.

nowhere near as ill as the previous comic strip mentioned about the boy and his tiger.

I think you mean "a boy and his dog"- aka, Marmaduke.

i meant exactly what i said.

Scott Adms: bad writer, bad artist, corporate stooge. Come the revolution, he will be dealt with harshly. Utter crap.