I liked it.

You nerds really get uncomfortable when someone tries to express themselves in an unconventional way.

..............n.............c..........

nonsense

n.c. wrote:
You nerds really get uncomfortable when someone tries to express themselves in an unconventional way.

..............n.............c..........

Not True. Bambouche's "diary type" stuff is really nice and I liked how bigolbug thoughtfully set up the info on his "In Utero" question in an extremely unassuming way and got a real answer without a mention of Pop Filters or Cheesy Breads.


When it looks like Nine Inch Nails liner notes....Crap.


Faiz

Dear Jimpy,

I have been reading (or struggling to read) your posts for quite a while now, and I've been meaning to ask you: why do you write the way you do?

I have no doubt that there are some ideas somewhere in those posts, but trying to ferret them out in a maze of long, over-extended ellipses with no breaks between sentence fragments is a chore.
e.e. cummings is easier to parse.
I've suspected a strange browser protocol, but it doesn't seem consistent. I'm all for 'unconventional' text-style, but seriously: it's difficult to take anything you say seriously. Take a look at the responses you get and see if I don't have at least a smidgen of a point.

I don't want to be the Internet Nazi here; keep doing what you're doing. If you could let me know WHY you do it in the way that you do, I could understand a bit more and perhaps join in on your conversations (provided you'll have me).

Thank you in advance,
Dylan

toomanyhelicopters, you hit the nail on the head with your first reply, I totally agree.

jimpy, chill the fuck out, throwing your rattle out of the pram won’t change a thing.