Studio Monitors?

1
Hello all,

I was wondering if anyone had any advice on a good of studio monitors. Right now I have a pair of the Sony (I believe the model is something like MD50 or something like that) headphones. They were like $100 new and work alright but I don't like mixing down with headphones. I was looking at a pair of KRK V8's. Any opinions or suggestions on KRK or other monitors would be appreciated. Thanks,

Scott Picco
Piccoman2@hotmail.com

Studio Monitors?

3
i just started working on the KRK K-Rock model. i've only done two or three sessions with them. the owner at my studio recently switched to them from Event 20/20s which i think suck. maybe they just sucked in our control room, i don't know. but i like the K Rocks much better already, and i can hear the improvement in my mixes. tighter bottom and smoother top than the Events. the Events are powered and biamped, the KRKs aren't. i'm not sure how much of a factor this is. so far, we having been driving the k rocks with a shitty alesis power amp, and i still like them better than the events.

i have never heard the KRK V8 model.

we also use yamaha NS10s which i think are great. they aren't flattering to the material and they are lacking in the bass end, but they are quite accurate. if i can make music sound good on NS10s, i am pretty confident it will sound good almost anywhere else. also, doing constant A/B tests between NS10s and the other monitors helped me adjust really easily when we switched models. it's too bad yamaha stopped making them.

tim

Studio Monitors?

4
In my personal studio in my home, I have the KRK V8s. Although I think they got a much better review than they deserve, still a very nice set of speakers. I've used the Event 20/20s and, although I don't think they were that bad, the V8s are a serious improvement.
The B&W Matrix 805 are really nice too. I heard they had some new line out, but have yet to experience them.
Are the Events you had powered speakers? I know they made some non-self powered speakers that were bad. The powered ones worked pretty well though.

Studio Monitors?

5
I have a pair of the Mackie HR824. They sound really good for the money and go as low as 37Hz and beyond 20kHz. Check them out for yourself. I really like them, they have great low end response and smooth clear high end with wide dispersion.
you can roll a Turd in Glitter....but it is still a turd

Studio Monitors?

6
brianbiv wrote:I have a pair of the Mackie HR824. They sound really good for the money and go as low as 37Hz and beyond 20kHz. Check them out for yourself. I really like them, they have great low end response and smooth clear high end with wide dispersion.


Don't you find the HR824's bright and full of too much irritating midrange? I use them to edit dialogue and music for film and they really fatigue my ears after a while. If I'm playing music through them I have to EQ it to get rid of some of that midrange irritation. I haven't found them to have "great low end response" at all. Just my 2 cents-I miss my old NS10's...

Studio Monitors?

7
i agree that the mackies don't have great low end response. that's what i liked about them when i used them on a regular basis a while back. i wouldn't want them to be the only set of monitors in the room, but i found them to be useful in the same way as i use NS10s (see earlier post).

tim

Studio Monitors?

8
Don't you find the HR824's bright and full of too much irritating midrange?

I found that the low end, maybe isnt huge, but is tight. I like the detail in the high frequencies. I find that Genelecs are extremely fatiguing to listen to for prolonged sessions, they are very transient and the 5-6kHz is ripping your head off. The NS-10s to me sound a bit more narrow, not as "20-20". But you can mix on anything or more importantly any where once you reference and keep referencing. Every control room is different, in the low end especially.
you can roll a Turd in Glitter....but it is still a turd

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest